[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3197?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15130806#comment-15130806
]
Eno Thereska commented on KAFKA-3197:
-------------------------------------
[~jjkoshy], [~becket_qin] Makes sense. I can't help but think of the analogy to
file systems. The only way to guarantee order is to do synchronous requests one
at a time. Async requests can never guarantee order. I believe the current
solution you are providing would work, but I wonder if it's worth taking a step
back and simplifying the options (perhaps to just two: async ---with any number
of requests outstanding --- and sync).
> Producer can send message out of order even when in flight request is set to
> 1.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: KAFKA-3197
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3197
> Project: Kafka
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: clients, producer
> Affects Versions: 0.9.0.0
> Reporter: Jiangjie Qin
> Assignee: Jiangjie Qin
> Fix For: 0.9.0.1
>
>
> The issue we saw is following:
> 1. Producer send message 0 to topic-partition-0 on broker A. The in-flight
> request to broker A is 1.
> 2. The request is somehow lost
> 3. Producer refreshed its topic metadata and found leader of
> topic-partition-0 migrated from broker A to broker B.
> 4. Because there is no in-flight request to broker B. All the subsequent
> messages to topic-partition-0 in the record accumulator are sent to broker B.
> 5. Later on when the request in step (1) times out, message 0 will be retried
> and sent to broker B. At this point, all the later messages has already been
> sent, so we have re-order.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
