I will send more detailed meeting notes regarding KIP-42 in the KIP-42 discussion thread.
Thanks, Anna On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 1:21 PM, Jun Rao <j...@confluent.io> wrote: > The following are the notes from today's KIP discussion. > > > - KIP-42: We agreed to leave the broker side interceptor for another > KIP. On the client side, people favor the 2nd option in Anna's proposal. > Anna will update the wiki accordingly. > - KIP-43: We discussed whether there is a need to support multiple SASL > mechanisms at the same time and what's the best way to implement this. > Will > discuss this in more details in the email thread. > - Jiangjie brought up an issue related to KIP-32 (adding timestamp field > in the message). The issue is that currently there is no convenient way > for > the consumer to tell whether the timestamp in a message is the create > time > or the server time. He and Guozhang propose to use a bit in the message > attribute to do that. Jiangjie will describe the proposal in the email > thread. > > > The video will be uploaded soon in > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Kafka+Improvement+Proposals > . > > Thanks, > > Jun > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Jun Rao <j...@confluent.io> wrote: > > > Hi, Everyone, > > > > We will have a Kafka KIP meeting tomorrow at 11:00am PST. If you plan to > > attend but haven't received an invite, please let me know. The following > is > > the agenda. > > > > Agenda: > > > > KIP-42: Add Producer and Consumer Interceptors > > > > Thanks, > > > > Jun > > >
