[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3083?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15101993#comment-15101993
 ] 

Flavio Junqueira commented on KAFKA-3083:
-----------------------------------------

Hey [~mgharat], Best practice with ZK is to put the master (controller in this 
case) on hold upon a connection loss event and wait until the next event, which 
can be flagging a reconnection or that the session has expired. It should call 
{{controllerResignation}} upon a session expiration, and resume if it 
reconnects.

But, we have to be careful because we can't really control the speed of 
messages, and even if A stops before B takes over in your example, we can't 
guarantee that some message from A will hit some broker somewhere late. The 
description of this jira says that C correctly discards an old message, and it 
should be like that, so this part looks fine this far. It is about the change 
in ZK happening at the wrong time.

> a soft failure in controller may leader a topic partition in an inconsistent 
> state
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KAFKA-3083
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3083
>             Project: Kafka
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: core
>    Affects Versions: 0.9.0.0
>            Reporter: Jun Rao
>            Assignee: Mayuresh Gharat
>
> The following sequence can happen.
> 1. Broker A is the controller and is in the middle of processing a broker 
> change event. As part of this process, let's say it's about to shrink the isr 
> of a partition.
> 2. Then broker A's session expires and broker B takes over as the new 
> controller. Broker B sends the initial leaderAndIsr request to all brokers.
> 3. Broker A continues by shrinking the isr of the partition in ZK and sends 
> the new leaderAndIsr request to the broker (say C) that leads the partition. 
> Broker C will reject this leaderAndIsr since the request comes from a 
> controller with an older epoch. Now we could be in a situation that Broker C 
> thinks the isr has all replicas, but the isr stored in ZK is different.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to