While this is a great idea, is it really ready for vote? I don't see any
detail in the wiki about what trees will be secured, and whether or not
that is configurable. I also don't see anything about how the use of admin
tools is going to be addressed.

-Todd

On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 8:48 AM, Grant Henke <ghe...@cloudera.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> Is it worth mentioning the follow up steps that were discussed in the KIP
> call in this KIP document? Some of them were:
>
>    - Adding SSL support for Zookeeper
>    - Removing the "world readable" assumption
>
> Thank you,
> Grant
>
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Onur Karaman <
> okara...@linkedin.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Flavio Junqueira <f...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks everyone for the feedback so far. At this point, I'd like to
> start
> > > a vote for KIP-38.
> > >
> > > Summary: Add support for ZooKeeper authentication
> > > KIP page:
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-38%3A+ZooKeeper+Authentication
> > > <
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-38:+ZooKeeper+Authentication
> > > >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > -Flavio
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Grant Henke
> Software Engineer | Cloudera
> gr...@cloudera.com | twitter.com/gchenke | linkedin.com/in/granthenke
>

Reply via email to