+1 on everything but the upgrade plan, which is a bit scary - will comment on the discuss thread.
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Mayuresh Gharat <gharatmayures...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 10:16 PM, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> ＋1 >> >> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 9:32 PM, Aditya Auradkar < >> aaurad...@linkedin.com.invalid> wrote: >> >> > +1 >> > >> > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 8:03 PM, Neha Narkhede <n...@confluent.io> >> wrote: >> > >> > > +1 >> > > >> > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 6:21 PM, Todd Palino <tpal...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > > >> > > > +1000 >> > > > >> > > > ! >> > > > >> > > > -Todd >> > > > >> > > > On Wednesday, September 23, 2015, Jiangjie Qin >> > <j...@linkedin.com.invalid >> > > > >> > > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > Hi, >> > > > > >> > > > > Thanks a lot for the reviews and feedback on KIP-31. It looks all >> the >> > > > > concerns of the KIP has been addressed. I would like to start the >> > > voting >> > > > > process. >> > > > > >> > > > > The short summary for the KIP: >> > > > > We are going to use the relative offset in the message format to >> > avoid >> > > > > server side recompression. >> > > > > >> > > > > In case you haven't got a chance to check, here is the KIP link. >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-31+-+Move+to+relative+offsets+in+compressed+message+sets >> > > > > >> > > > > Thanks, >> > > > > >> > > > > Jiangjie (Becket) Qin >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Thanks, >> > > Neha >> > > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> -- Guozhang >> > > > > -- > -Regards, > Mayuresh R. Gharat > (862) 250-7125
