Jun, Would be nice to have https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2106 (if not that, than related https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1792 ) in 0.9 release. Both have patch provided. If KAFKA-2106 is delivered, maybe KAFKA-1792 is redundant, not needed.
For some reason KAFKA-2106 has "Affects Version/s" set to 0.9, maybe "Fix Version/s" should be set to that value instead. Kind regards, Stevo Slavic. On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Stevo Slavić <ssla...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Jason, > > Maybe this answers your question: > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201509.mbox/%3CCAFc58G-UScVKrSF1kdsowQ8Y96OAaZEdiZsk40G8fwf7iToFaw%40mail.gmail.com%3E > > Kind regards, > Stevo Slavic. > > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Jason Rosenberg <j...@squareup.com> wrote: > >> Hi Jun, >> >> Can you clarify, will there not be a 0.8.3.0 (and instead we move straight >> to 0.9.0.0)? >> >> Also, can you outline the man new features/updates for 0.9.0.0? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Jason >> >> On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Jun Rao <j...@confluent.io> wrote: >> >> > The following is a candidate list of jiras that we want to complete in >> the >> > upcoming release (0.9.0.0). Our goal is to finish at least all the >> blockers >> > and as many as the non-blockers possible in that list. >> > >> > >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20KAFKA%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%2C%20%22Patch%20Available%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.0.0 >> > >> > Anything should be added/removed from this list? >> > >> > We are shooting to cut an 0.9.0.0 release branch in early October. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > >> > Jun >> > >> > >
