+1 for 0.9 - we may want to get rid of deprecated configs if possible in this, instead of waiting for 1.0.
Thanks, Mayuresh On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Joel Koshy <jjkosh...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 on 0.9 - we may want to adjust our ApiVersions accordingly (i.e., > 0.8.3 -> 0.9.0) > > > On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > +1 on 0.9 as well. > > > > On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Aditya Auradkar < > > aaurad...@linkedin.com.invalid> wrote: > > > >> +1 on 0.9 > >> > >> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Edward Ribeiro < > edward.ribe...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > +1 on 0.9.0 > >> > > >> > On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Ashish Singh <asi...@cloudera.com> > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > > +1 on 0.9.0 > >> > > > >> > > On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io> > >> wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > I propose a simple rename: s/0.8.3/0.9.0/ > >> > > > > >> > > > No change of scope and not including current 0.9.0 issues. > >> > > > > >> > > > On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Rajini Sivaram < > >> > > > rajinisiva...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > > Is the plan to release 0.9 in October with the features > currently > >> > > > targeted > >> > > > > for 0.8.3, or would 0.9 be a later release including all the > issues > >> > > > > currently targeted for 0.8.3 and 0.9? Will the scope of the > release > >> > > > change > >> > > > > when it is renamed? > >> > > > > Thanks, > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Rajini > >> > > > > > >> > > > > On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 7:21 PM, Jay Kreps <j...@confluent.io> > >> wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > +1 on 0.9 > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > -Jay > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Gwen Shapira < > g...@confluent.io > >> > > >> > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Hi Kafka Fans, > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > What do you think of making the next release (the one with > >> > > security, > >> > > > > new > >> > > > > > > consumer, quotas, etc) a 0.9.0 instead of 0.8.3? > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > It has lots of new features, and new consumer was pretty > much > >> > > scoped > >> > > > > for > >> > > > > > > 0.9.0, so it matches our original roadmap. I feel that so > many > >> > > > awesome > >> > > > > > > features deserve a better release number. > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > The downside is mainly some confusion (we refer to 0.8.3 in > >> bunch > >> > > of > >> > > > > > > places), and noisy emails from JIRA while we change "fix > >> version" > >> > > > field > >> > > > > > > everywhere. > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Thoughts? > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > -- > >> > > > >> > > Regards, > >> > > Ashish > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > -- Guozhang > -- -Regards, Mayuresh R. Gharat (862) 250-7125
