For obvious reasons, I definitely won't object, but I will probably quickly
have a follow-up patch to add a very basic system test for Copycat. I was
trying to get it in with this patch since I think it is a good idea to
encourage people to write system tests with major additions like this, but
I think we need to release an update to ducktape first.

@Gwen, if you want me to rename Coordinator -> Herder, let me know before
you merge :) I'm definitely not opposed to a little naming silliness, I
just hadn't gotten to updating the patch yet.

-Ewen

On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 11:26 PM, Neha Narkhede <n...@confluent.io> wrote:

> +1 on resolving some of these open issues separately. It is a pain to
> maintain, review, discuss and commit these type of large patches. Typically
> the set of improvements to really stabilize new features like this go well
> beyond one large initial patch anyway.
>
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 10:24 PM, Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io> wrote:
>
> > Reminder:
> > If no one objects, I'm planning on merging PR-99 tomorrow.
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Kafka fans,
> > >
> > > I'd like to move ahead with getting the initial Copycat patches into
> > Kafka.
> > >
> > > If you'll look at the PR, we still have a number of open questions on
> the
> > > API (batch connectors, connector upgrades, data formats). I believe it
> > will
> > > be easier to iterate on those independently of getting the basic patch
> > in,
> > > but this means that the API we are committing may change in the next
> few
> > > month (before the 0.8.3 release).
> > >
> > > Here is my plan:
> > > 1. Add Stability attributes (The type that Hadoop and Guavas have) to
> > > Kafka.
> > > 2. Ewen agreed to mark the data API and connector APIs as "unstable",
> so
> > > no one will get caught by surprise if they implement a connector and
> the
> > > APIs move
> > > 3. I will start few concurrent discussions on the mailing list on what
> we
> > > see as open issues (the data API discussion already started by Ewen).
> > > Please chime in.
> > > 4. While the discussions are still on-going we will commit the initial
> > > CopyCat patch to allow people to try it out and give feedback.
> > >
> > > If someone objects to this plan, please respond ASAP. We'd like to get
> > the
> > > plan done by Friday.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Gwen
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Neha
>



-- 
Thanks,
Ewen

Reply via email to