+1 (binding)

On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 3:26 AM, Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to start a vote on dropping support for Scala 2.9 for the next
> release. People seemed to be in favour of the idea in previous discussions:
>
> * http://search-hadoop.com/m/uyzND1uIW3k2fZVfU1
> * http://search-hadoop.com/m/uyzND1KMLNK11Rmo72
>
> Summary of why we should drop Scala 2.9:
>
> * Doubles the number of builds required from 2 to 4 (2.9.1 and 2.9.2 are
> not binary compatible).
> * Code has been committed to trunk that doesn't build with Scala 2.9 weeks
> ago and no-one seems to have noticed or cared (well, I filed
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2325). Can we really support a
> version if we don't test it?
> * New clients library is written in Java and won't be affected. It also has
> received a lot of work and it's much improved since the last release.
> * It was released 4 years ago, it has been unsupported for a long time and
> most projects have dropped support for it (for example, we use a different
> version of ScalaTest for Scala 2.9)
> * Scala 2.10 introduced Futures and a few useful features like String
> interpolation and value classes.
> * Doesn't work with Java 8 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2203
> ).
>
> The reason not to drop it is to maintain compatibility for people stuck in
> 2.9 who also want to upgrade both client and broker to the next Kafka
> release.
>
> The vote will run for 72 hours.
>
> +1 (non-binding) from me.
>
> Best,
> Ismael

Reply via email to