+1. Thanks Ewen!! On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Neha Narkhede <n...@confluent.io> wrote:
> +1 (binding) > > Thanks Ewen for taking on something that the Kafka project has long waited > for! > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Jay Kreps <j...@confluent.io> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Super excited! > > > > -Jay > > > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Ewen Cheslack-Postava < > e...@confluent.io> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Let's start a vote on KIP-26: Add Copycat connector framework for data > > > import/export > > > > > > For reference, here's the wiki: > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=58851767 > > > And the mailing list thread (split across two months): > > > > > > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201506.mbox/%3CCAE1jLMOEJjnorFK5CtR3g-n%3Dm_AkrFsYeccsB4QimTRfGBrAGQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E > > > > > > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201507.mbox/%3CCAHwHRrUeNh%2BnCHwCTUCrcipHM3Po0ECUysO%2B%3DX3nwUeOGrcgdw%40mail.gmail.com%3E > > > > > > Just to clarify since this is a bit different from the KIPs voted on so > > > far, the KIP just covers including Copycat in Kafka (rather than having > > it > > > as a separate project). While the KIP aimed to be clear about the exact > > > scope, the details require further discussion. The aim is to include > some > > > connectors as well, at a minimum for demonstration purposes, but the > > > expectation is that connector development will, by necessity, be > > federated. > > > > > > I'll kick it off with a +1 (non-binding). > > > > > > -- > > > Thanks, > > > Ewen > > > > > > > > > -- > Thanks, > Neha > -- -- Guozhang
