Hi Ismael,
I have a couple of comments on the wiki pages / merge scripts: 1. In the wiki page it mentions "If the change is new, then it usually needs a new JIRA. However, trivial changes, where "what should change" is virtually the same as "how it should change" do not require a JIRA. Example: "Fix typos in Foo scaladoc"." So it sounds we are going to allow pull requests without a JIRA ticket, but later we are also mentioning: "The PR title should be of the form [KAFKA-xxxx].." which is a bit conflicting with the previous statement. Could you clarify it? Today our commits are mostly with JIRAs except some trivial ones that are only done by committers, I can either extend this to non-committers or not, just that we need to make it clear. 2. The git commit message is a little verbose to me, for example: ------ commit ee88dbb67f19b787e12ccef37982c9459b78c7b6 Author: Geoff Anderson <ge...@confluent.io> Date: Thu Jul 9 14:58:01 2015 -0700 KAFKA-2327; broker doesn't start if config defines advertised.host but not advertised.port Added unit tests as well. These fail without the fix, but pass with the fix. Author: Geoff Anderson <ge...@confluent.io> Closes #73 from granders/KAFKA-2327 and squashes the following commits: 52a2085 [Geoff Anderson] Cleaned up unecessary toString calls 23b3340 [Geoff Anderson] Fixes KAFKA-2327 ------ The "Author" field is redundant, and we could probably also omit the github commits. What do you think? Guozhang