Michael,

The ssl work in now being done in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1690. It would be great if you
can help review it too. Also updated the top level security jira
accordingly.

Thanks,

Jun

On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Michael Herstine <
mherst...@linkedin.com.invalid> wrote:

> Regarding the SSL code‹ is there an RB available? I don¹t see a recent
> patch uploaded to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1684Š How
> can other folks see the code?
>
> On 5/12/15, 12:07 PM, "Gwen Shapira" <gshap...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
> >My notes from the hangout:
> >
> >* KIP-11: Based on feedback from Joel - group privileges will become READ.
> >Parth will open a new thread with a summary and re-open the vote.
> >
> >* Updated that I¹m still working on KAFKA-1928, Jay clarified that some of
> >the assertions may no longer be valid, but we should add the ones that
> >make
> >sense
> >
> >* Harsha asked for review of SSL code, Jun will pick it up.
> >
> >* KIP-19: Even though using MetaData timeout for requests is confusing, it
> >makes sense to use for data still in accumulator when leader is not
> >available. Request timeout will be used for data out of accumulator.
> >Configuration should tie replication timeout and request timeout together
> >by default, to simplify. Also validate that request timeout is longer than
> >replication timeout. We need reasonable default values as well. Long
> >discussion on names of parameters. Guozhang will summarize issues
> >identified - mainly around retries.
> >
> >* KIP-21: We will go with hybrid approach - server configuration will
> >remain in files and static (i.e. no SIGHUP), dynamic entities (topic,
> >clients, users, whatever) can have overrides in ZK. Aditya will update KIP
> >with details.
> >
> >As usual, correct me if I got it wrong!
> >
> >Gwen
>
>

Reply via email to