-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29091/#review80031
-----------------------------------------------------------


This patch is looking really good. One minor issue but otherwise good to go.


core/src/main/scala/kafka/log/FileMessageSet.scala
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/29091/#comment129783>

    Forcing a flush here will block all writes to the segment during a log 
roll() (potentially for upward of 30 seconds). I don't actually think this 
flush is needed since we have a background process which handles the segment 
flush. I think trim() should just trim the excess bytes and the close() can 
still force the flush.



core/src/main/scala/kafka/log/LogConfig.scala
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/29091/#comment129784>

    


- Jay Kreps


On April 14, 2015, 10:54 a.m., Qianlin Xia wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/29091/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 14, 2015, 10:54 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for kafka.
> 
> 
> Bugs: KAFKA-1646
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1646
> 
> 
> Repository: kafka
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Commit to local for 1646 fix
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   core/src/main/scala/kafka/log/FileMessageSet.scala 
> e1f8b979c3e6f62ea235bd47bc1587a1291443f9 
>   core/src/main/scala/kafka/log/Log.scala 
> 46df8d99d977a3b010a9b9f4698187fa9bfb2498 
>   core/src/main/scala/kafka/log/LogConfig.scala 
> 18c86fed5efc765f9b059775988cc83ef0ef3c3b 
>   core/src/main/scala/kafka/log/LogSegment.scala 
> 0d6926ea105a99c9ff2cfc9ea6440f2f2d37bde8 
>   core/src/main/scala/kafka/server/KafkaConfig.scala 
> 0a288f986efc7afba9aad2df70261a9c46829db6 
>   core/src/main/scala/kafka/utils/Utils.scala 
> a89b0463685e6224d263bc9177075e1bb6b93d04 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29091/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Qianlin Xia
> 
>

Reply via email to