[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1684?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14207411#comment-14207411
]
Gwen Shapira commented on KAFKA-1684:
-------------------------------------
For 7:
I don't think we'll use the same port for SSL and SASL. Do you see any reason
to try and do it that way? Pulling up the correct Channel based on port seems
like the easiest way to implement the different authentication mechanisms.
> Implement TLS/SSL authentication
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: KAFKA-1684
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1684
> Project: Kafka
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: security
> Affects Versions: 0.9.0
> Reporter: Jay Kreps
> Assignee: Ivan Lyutov
> Attachments: KAFKA-1684.patch
>
>
> Add an SSL port to the configuration and advertise this as part of the
> metadata request.
> If the SSL port is configured the socket server will need to add a second
> Acceptor thread to listen on it. Connections accepted on this port will need
> to go through the SSL handshake prior to being registered with a Processor
> for request processing.
> SSL requests and responses may need to be wrapped or unwrapped using the
> SSLEngine that was initialized by the acceptor. This wrapping and unwrapping
> is very similar to what will need to be done for SASL-based authentication
> schemes. We should have a uniform interface that covers both of these and we
> will need to store the instance in the session with the request. The socket
> server will have to use this object when reading and writing requests. We
> will need to take care with the FetchRequests as the current
> FileChannel.transferTo mechanism will be incompatible with wrap/unwrap so we
> can only use this optimization for unencrypted sockets that don't require
> userspace translation (wrapping).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
