[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14206698#comment-14206698
]
Gwen Shapira commented on KAFKA-1753:
-------------------------------------
--replace-broker 1 --broker-list 2,3,4 can work.
I'm wondering about the semantics when broker list is not mentioned. Is it an
error, or do we assume "just move partitions to any broker, try to balance
things out".
The nice thing about --decommission-broker semantics is that I can have a 30
node cluster and decommission one without caring especially where partitions go
to. A broker list with 29 brokers is pretty annoying :)
> add --decommission-broker option
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: KAFKA-1753
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1753
> Project: Kafka
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: tools
> Reporter: Dmitry Pekar
> Assignee: Dmitry Pekar
> Fix For: 0.8.3
>
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
