[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1710?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14186350#comment-14186350
 ] 

Bhavesh Mistry edited comment on KAFKA-1710 at 10/28/14 4:58 AM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------

[~jkreps],

I understand the current code base is adding bytes to shared memory and doing 
compression (on application thread).  The older consumer seems to do all this 
in back-ground thread.  So What changed to have this in fore-ground ?  Also, if 
you had to re-engineer this code, How would you  re-engineer to remove 
Synchronization and move everything in background so more runable state is give 
to Application Thread and cost of enqueue will very less.  (Of Course at cost 
of memory).  

I am really interested in solving this problem for my application.  So I just 
wanted to know your suggestions/ideas, how would you solve this ?

Thanks for all your help so far !!    Only think I can think of is do 
*AsynKafkaProducer* as mentioned in previous comments where [~ewencp] mentioned 
that problem will be those threads that are enqueue message at cost of memory, 
thread context switching etc...

Thanks,

Bhavesh 


was (Author: bmis13):
[~jkreps],

I understand the current code base is adding bytes to shared memory and doing 
compression (on application thread).  The older consumer seems to do all this 
in back-ground thread.  So What changed to have this in fore-ground ?  Also, if 
you had to re-engineer this code, How would you  re-engineer to remove 
Synchronization and move everything in background so more runable state is give 
to Application Thread and cost of enqueue will very less.  (Of Course at cost 
of memory).  

I am really interested in solving this problem for my application.  So I just 
wanted to know your suggestions/ideas, how would you solve this ?

Thanks for all your help so far !!  

Thanks,

Bhavesh 

> [New Java Producer Potential Deadlock] Producer Deadlock when all messages is 
> being sent to single partition
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KAFKA-1710
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1710
>             Project: Kafka
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: producer 
>         Environment: Development
>            Reporter: Bhavesh Mistry
>            Assignee: Ewen Cheslack-Postava
>            Priority: Critical
>              Labels: performance
>         Attachments: Screen Shot 2014-10-13 at 10.19.04 AM.png, Screen Shot 
> 2014-10-15 at 9.09.06 PM.png, Screen Shot 2014-10-15 at 9.14.15 PM.png, 
> TestNetworkDownProducer.java, th1.dump, th10.dump, th11.dump, th12.dump, 
> th13.dump, th14.dump, th15.dump, th2.dump, th3.dump, th4.dump, th5.dump, 
> th6.dump, th7.dump, th8.dump, th9.dump
>
>
> Hi Kafka Dev Team,
> When I run the test to send message to single partition for 3 minutes or so 
> on, I have encounter deadlock (please see the screen attached) and thread 
> contention from YourKit profiling.  
> Use Case:
> 1)  Aggregating messages into same partition for metric counting. 
> 2)  Replicate Old Producer behavior for sticking to partition for 3 minutes.
> Here is output:
> Frozen threads found (potential deadlock)
>  
> It seems that the following threads have not changed their stack for more 
> than 10 seconds.
> These threads are possibly (but not necessarily!) in a deadlock or hung.
>  
> pool-1-thread-128 <--- Frozen for at least 2m
> org.apache.kafka.clients.producer.internals.RecordAccumulator.append(TopicPartition,
>  byte[], byte[], CompressionType, Callback) RecordAccumulator.java:139
> org.apache.kafka.clients.producer.KafkaProducer.send(ProducerRecord, 
> Callback) KafkaProducer.java:237
> org.kafka.test.TestNetworkDownProducer$MyProducer.run() 
> TestNetworkDownProducer.java:84
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker) 
> ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run() 
> ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615
> java.lang.Thread.run() Thread.java:744
> pool-1-thread-159 <--- Frozen for at least 2m 1 sec
> org.apache.kafka.clients.producer.internals.RecordAccumulator.append(TopicPartition,
>  byte[], byte[], CompressionType, Callback) RecordAccumulator.java:139
> org.apache.kafka.clients.producer.KafkaProducer.send(ProducerRecord, 
> Callback) KafkaProducer.java:237
> org.kafka.test.TestNetworkDownProducer$MyProducer.run() 
> TestNetworkDownProducer.java:84
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker) 
> ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run() 
> ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615
> java.lang.Thread.run() Thread.java:744
> pool-1-thread-55 <--- Frozen for at least 2m
> org.apache.kafka.clients.producer.internals.RecordAccumulator.append(TopicPartition,
>  byte[], byte[], CompressionType, Callback) RecordAccumulator.java:139
> org.apache.kafka.clients.producer.KafkaProducer.send(ProducerRecord, 
> Callback) KafkaProducer.java:237
> org.kafka.test.TestNetworkDownProducer$MyProducer.run() 
> TestNetworkDownProducer.java:84
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker) 
> ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run() 
> ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615
> java.lang.Thread.run() Thread.java:744
> Thanks,
> Bhavesh 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to