Hi, Discussing the DLQ support with others, it became clear that the DLQ messages are missing any indication of why the message was DLQed. In common with other DLQ KIPs in Kafka, such as KIP-1034, I propose to add __dlq.errors.message to the set of headers added to DLQ records. This is a short, human-readable indication of why the message was DLQed, such as whether it was rejected or reached the maximum number of delivery attempts.
Let me know if there are any concerns with amending KIP-1191. Thanks, Andrew On 2026/03/06 03:12:43 Chia-Ping Tsai wrote: > > +1(binding) > > > Andrew Schofield <[email protected]> 於 2026年3月6日 凌晨12:17 寫道： > > > > +1 (binding) > > > >> On 2026/03/05 14:57:27 Bill Bejeck wrote: > >> Hi Andrew, > >> Thanks for the KIP. I've read the discussion thread and I don't have > >> anything to add to what's already been asked and answered. > >> > >> +1(binding) > >> > >> -Bill > >> > >> On Tue, Feb 10, 2026 at 11:41 AM Apoorv Mittal <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi Andrew, > >>> Thanks for the KIP and the answers on the discussion thread. > >>> > >>> +1 (binding) > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> Apoorv Mittal > >>> > >>> > >>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 10:59 AM Andrew Schofield < > >>> [email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi, > >>>> I’d like to start the voting on KIP-1191: Dead-letter queues for share > >>>> groups. It provides an automated > >>>> way to handle records which fail delivery in a share group by writing to > >>> a > >>>> dead-letter queue topic. > >>>> > >>>> KIP: > >>>> > >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1191%3A+Dead-letter+queues+for+share+groups > >>>> > >>>> Discussion thread: > >>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/1fdxqtssx225ndnc8kdgl7b96wovcyxb > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> Andrew > >>>> > >>> > >> >
