Thanks Matthias

I reviewed the older KIP and release notes, the older KIP is logically same. 
Hence JIRA ticket should be marked closed with the implemented KIP.

Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
________________________________
From: Matthias J. Sax <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 4, 2026 4:47:58 AM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: [EXT] Re: KIP-1293: Add Time-Shift Parameter to Kafka Streams 
Punctuation Scheduling

Warning External sender Do not click on any links or open any attachments 
unless you trust the sender and know the content is safe.

Ankur,

thanks for the KIP. I did not read up on the Jira ticket yet, but what
you propose on the KIP sounds like KIP-1146
(https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1146: Anchored 
punctuation<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1146: 
Anchored punctuation>)
which we completed for AK 4.2 release already.

Are you saying that KIP-1146 did already resolve the Jira, and we did
not realize it, and thus did not close the ticket?


-Matthias

This email was screened for spam and malicious content but exercise caution 
anyway.



On 3/3/26 4:03 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> I would like to start the discussion on a proposed KIP related to KAFKA-13678.
> This idea follows the suggestion in the JIRA discussion to extend the 
> existing scheduling mechanism with a time-shift parameter rather than 
> introducing a new abstraction. The goal is to allow globally aligned 
> scheduling while keeping the API simple and consistent with current semantics.
> The draft KIP is available here:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1293%3A+Add+Time-Shift+Parameter+to+Kafka+Streams+Punctuation+Scheduling<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1293%3A+Add+Time-Shift+Parameter+to+Kafka+Streams+Punctuation+Scheduling>
> The JIRA is here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-13678<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-13678>
> Looking forward to your thoughts and suggestions.
> Thanks,
> Ankur
>
>

Reply via email to