Hi Chia-Ping, Thanks for your comments. The proposed configuration change adds more flexibility while preserving the original behavior, and two others also agreed with it. So I’ve adopted the suggestion and updated the KIP and PR accordingly. Really appreciate your input!
Hi all, The new comments have been addressed. Could someone please take another look at this KIP and vote if no further issues are found? We just need one vote now to move this forward . Thanks in advance. Regards, Jian Chia-Ping Tsai <[email protected]> 于2026年2月5日周四 03:08写道： > hi Jian > > Sorry for the late reply. I raised a major comment here: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/tr0khlvvpstqbqz3fs1xod0hzc9sf66p > > please take a look, thanks > > On 2026/01/12 13:12:13 jian fu wrote: > > Hi all: > > > > I would like to start a vote for the KIP: > > > > The KIP: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/A4LMFw > > The Draft PR: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/20913 > > > > Summary: > > > > Currently, Kafka's tiered storage implementation uploads all non-active > > local log segments to remote storage immediately, even when they are > still > > within the local retention period. > > This results in redundant storage of the same data in both local and > remote > > which don't have real value in some cases. > > This KIP's goal is to reduce the remote storage as an optional topic > > feature which can be implemented with few code lines. > > > > Thanks. > > Jian > > >
