Hi All,
Thanks for the votes. Closing this thread.

Regards,
Sushant Mahajan

On Fri, 24 Oct 2025, 21:43 Andrew Schofield, <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi Sushant,
> Thanks for the KIP.
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Andrew
>
> > On 24 Oct 2025, at 16:38, Lianet M. <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the KIP Sushant,
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Best,
> > Lianet
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 24, 2025 at 11:04 AM Christo Lolov <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hello on this thread!
> >>
> >> +1 from me (binding)
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Christo
> >>
> >> On Fri, 24 Oct 2025 at 15:08, Apoorv Mittal <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Sushant,
> >>> Thanks for the KIP.
> >>>
> >>> +1 (binding)
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Apoorv Mittal
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Oct 22, 2025 at 1:28 PM Sushant Mahajan <[email protected]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>> I'd like to start a vote on KIP-1222
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1222%3A+Acquisition+lock+timeout+renewal+in+share+consumer+explicit+mode
> >>>>
> >>>> It proposes a new acknowledgement type RENEW, which applications
> >> requiring
> >>>> additional time to process records can use to renew the acquisition
> >> lock
> >>>> timeout on them.
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>> Sushant Mahajan
> >>>>
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to