Hi team, Does anyone else wants to have a look at the KIP or PR[1] ?
Thanks! Best, Ivan [1] https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/19850 On Thu, Sep 4, 2025, at 12:42, Ivan Yurchenko wrote: > Hi Ismael, > > If I understand your question, in KIP-392 the `client.rack` config serves > both as setting the rack and as the on/off switch for the whole feature. In > KIP-1123, these are separate. Originally I thought that having separate > configs would be more explicit and more future-proof: in case some other new > feature that rely on the `client.rack` setting is added. Do you think I > should change it to the single config to be uniform with KIP-392? > > Best, > Ivan > > > On Sun, Jul 20, 2025, at 23:15, Ismael Juma wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Thanks for the KIP. One question I have is why two configs are needed > > instead of a single config? KIP-392 specifies a single client side config. > > It would be good to be consistent across the clients. > > > > Ismael > > > > On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 3:37 AM Ivan Yurchenko <i...@ivanyu.me> wrote: > > > > > Hello all, > > > > > > I'd like to propose a new KIP to discuss: KIP-1123: Rack-aware > > > partitioning for Kafka Producer [1]. > > > > > > Best, > > > Ivan Yurchenko > > > > > > [1] > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1123%3A+Rack-aware+partitioning+for+Kafka+Producer > > > > > >
