Hi TengYao,
Thanks for the KIP, I have some questions:
AM1: There exists metric
"kafka.network:type=Acceptor,name=AcceptorBlockedPercent,listener={listener}"
which records blocked time for all the requests which are waiting for
connection slot, because of throttling time or no connection slot. Is this
metric not sufficient to understand how much is the wait time for specific
listener type for accepting new connections?
AM2: The current "kafka.network:type=Acceptor" metric is of type yammer. Are
the new metrics in KIP are also of type yammer? If yes then the naming
convention for yammer metrics is different than other kafka metrics i.e.
follows pascal casing.
Regards,
Apoorv Mittal
On 2025/04/13 13:43:20 TengYao Chi wrote:
> Hi Chia-Ping
>
> chia_0: Thanks for pointing that out. I have fixed it.
>
> Best Regards,
> TengYao
>
> Chia-Ping Tsai <chia7...@gmail.com> 於 2025年4月13日 週日 下午3:42寫道：
>
> > hi Teng
> >
> > Thanks for this KIP. Some questions are listed below.
> >
> > chia_0:
> >
> > The listener is included by the tag, so should it be removed from “name”.
> >
> > ${listener_name}-waiting-connection -> waiting-connection
> >
> > Best,
> > Chia-Ping
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > TengYao Chi <kiting...@gmail.com> 於 2025年4月13日 下午2:50 寫道：
> > >
> > > Hello everyone,
> > >
> > > I want to start a discussion thread on KIP-1130
> > > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/sYpEF>, which proposes adding
> > > metrics indicating the connection count exceeds
> > >
> > > Please take a look and let me know what you think.
> > > I would appreciate any suggestions and feedback.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > TengYao
> >
>
