[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-13224?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Chia-Ping Tsai resolved KAFKA-13224.
------------------------------------
    Fix Version/s: 3.1.0
         Assignee: Colin McCabe  (was: Ron Dagostino)
       Resolution: Fixed

> broker.id does not appear in config's originals map when setting just node.id
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KAFKA-13224
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-13224
>             Project: Kafka
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0
>            Reporter: Ron Dagostino
>            Assignee: Colin McCabe
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 3.1.0
>
>
> Plugins may expect broker.id to exist as a key in the config's various 
> originals()-related maps, but with KRaft we rely solely on node.id for the 
> broker's ID, and with the Zk-based brokers we provide the option to specify 
> node.id in addition to (or as a full replacement for) broker.id. 
>  There are multiple problems related to this switch to node.id:
> # We do not enforce consistency between explicitly-specified broker.id and 
> node.id properties in the config -- it is entirely possible right now that we 
> could set broker.id=0 and also set node.id=1, and the broker will use 1 for 
> it's ID. This is confusing at best; the broker should detect this 
> inconsistency and fail to start with a ConfigException.
> # When node.id is set, both that value and any explicitly-set broker.id value 
> will exist in the config's *originals()-related maps*. Downstream components 
> are often configured based on these maps, and they may ask for the broker.id, 
> so downstream components may be misconfigured if the values differ, or they 
> may fail during configuration if no broker.id key exists in the map at all.
> # The config's *values()-related maps* will contain either the 
> explicitly-specified broker.id value or the default value of -1.  When 
> node.id is set, both that value (which cannot be negative) and the 
> (potentially -1) broker.id value will exist in the config's values()-related 
> maps. Downstream components are often configured based on these maps, and 
> they may ask for the broker.id, so downstream components may be misconfigured 
> if the broker.id value differs from the broker's true ID.
> The broker should detect inconsistency between explicitly-specified broker.id 
> and node.id values and fail startup accordingly. It should also ensures that 
> the config's originals()- and values()-related maps contain the same mapped 
> values for both broker.id and node.id keys.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to