Hi, thanks for the KIP and sorry for the late reply. Should we also
highlight the reduced latency in the motivation section?


On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 9:24 PM Ivan Yurchenko <i...@ivanyu.me> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I took the pause with this KIP while Kafka 4.0 was in making to not distract 
> the folks. Now let's continue the discussion!
>
> Thank you for the comments, Luke! I've applied your suggestions.
>
> Best,
> Ivan
>
> On Mon, Dec 23, 2024, at 03:23, Luke Chen wrote:
> > Hi Ivan,
> >
> > Thanks for the KIP!
> > This is a great improvement from the cost and latency perspective!
> >
> > Some comments:
> > 1. In the description of `partitioner.rack.aware` config, it'd be better to
> > make it clear that this setting has no effect if a custom partitioner is
> > used.
> >
> > 2. "Select the next partition from all partitions following the current
> > algorithm in the following cases:"
> > I think there should be one more case that "If the "partitioner.rack.aware"
> > is false;
> >
> > 3. "If the automatic partitioning is needed (i.e. no record partition or
> > key is specified):"
> > I think we should also add the case: "key is provided but
> > `partitioner.ignore.keys`
> > is enabled"
> >
> > Thank you.
> > Luke
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 21, 2024 at 2:32 AM Stanislav Kozlovski <
> > stanislavkozlov...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Wow, I am super happy to see this KIP! Thanks for publishing it!
> > >
> > > I threw the idea out there last week in an article of mine about
> > > calculating Kafka costs[1]
> > >
> > > > [FUTURE KIP] - a Produce to Local Leader KIP, similar to KIP-392, can be
> > > introduced to eliminate producer inter-AZ network costs for topics that do
> > > not have keys.
> > > > there is no fundamental reason that a topic without ordering guarantees
> > > needs to produce to a specific partition - why not just choose the broker
> > > in the closest zone?
> > > > if all of your traffic is unkeyed, then this can further reduce Kafka’s
> > > network cost by 25%.
> > > > it sounds like a change that wouldn’t be too complicated, maybe even
> > > achievable today through the Producer’s partitioner.
> > >
> > > I don't know if you saw it from there, but I'm super happy to see it come
> > > to fruition! It's even easier than I thought - I didn't realize we had the
> > > node/rack information in the partitioner already.
> > >
> > > I think it will be very impactful.
> > > We've seen the strong trend in the industry of trading off latency for
> > > cost reduction. Namely - almost every vendor has introduced some sort of
> > > leaderless Kafka API model that outsources replication to a remote store
> > > cost[2][3][4][5]. This in turn allows them to reduce cross-zone networking
> > > costs to literally zero. In certain optimized deployments the networking
> > > cost can be up to 80-90% of the total cost![6] KIP-392 allows us to
> > > eliminate the consumer-side traffic cost, but there is great motivation to
> > > enable users to do the same for producers that don't depend on ordering.
> > >
> > > I am +1 the KIP as is.
> > >
> > > One may make an argument to have a way to enable it server-side via the
> > > broker, but I'd like to hear a good reason for that. I believe the
> > > simplicity in the current state is preferred, since clients already have
> > > freedom to produce to any partition they explicitly choose.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Stan
> > >
> > > [1]
> > > https://bigdata.2minutestreaming.com/p/the-brutal-truth-about-apache-kafka-cost-calculators
> > > [2] WarpStream and its $220m acquisition
> > > https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/how-confluent-acquired-warpstream-220m-after-just-13-months-hxgyf/
> > > [3] Confluent Freight
> > > https://www.confluent.io/blog/introducing-confluent-cloud-freight-clusters/
> > > [4] RedPanda Cloud Topics
> > > https://www.redpanda.com/blog/cloud-topics-streaming-data-object-storage
> > > [5] BufStream https://buf.build/product/bufstream
> > > [6] calculator https://akalculator.com/
> > >
> > > On 2024/12/20 11:35:28 Ivan Yurchenko wrote:
> > > > Hello all,
> > > >
> > > > I'd like to propose a new KIP to discuss: KIP-1123: Rack-aware
> > > partitioning for Kafka Producer [1].
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > Ivan Yurchenko
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1123%3A+Rack-aware+partitioning+for+Kafka+Producer
> > > >
> > >
> >

Reply via email to