Thanks for taking the time to vote on this KIP. Since we have the required +1s, I'll go ahead and close the vote.
The results are: * 5 binding +1 from Ismael, Bruno, Chia-Ping, Andrew, and David J * 2 non-binding +1 community votes from Ukpa and TengYao * No -1 votes The KIP is now accepted. As mentioned in the thread above, only committer's votes are binding for the adoption of a KIP. Community votes are not binding, but they are encouraged and greatly appreciated! Thanks! David A On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 5:07 AM David Jacot <dja...@confluent.io.invalid> wrote: > +1 (binding. Thanks for the KIP! > > DJ > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 10:57 AM Andrew Schofield < > andrew_schofield_j...@outlook.com> wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Thanks for the KIP. > > > > Andrew > > > > ________________________________________ > > From: TengYao Chi <kiting...@gmail.com> > > Sent: 13 February 2025 09:38 > > To: dev@kafka.apache.org <dev@kafka.apache.org> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-1126: Serialize changes to Kafka with a build > queue > > > > Hi Ukpa > > > > FYI, your votes are not binding if you are not a committer for the Apache > > Kafka project. > > Please see here > > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Bylaws#Bylaws-Voting> > > for > > more details. > > You can vote with "+1 (non-binding)". > > Although it doesn't have the same effect as a binding vote, expressing > your > > ideas by voting is still great. 😀 > > > > Best regards > > TengYao > > > > Chia-Ping Tsai <chia7...@gmail.com> 於 2025年2月13日 週四 下午5:36寫道： > > > > > hi Uchechi > > > > > > Thanks for your vote. As a reminder, the vote is assumed to be binding > > > only if it is from kafka committer. Your vote is definitely important > to > > > Kafka community, and I just try to explain the vote rule here. > > > > > > Best, > > > Chia-Ping > > > > > > > Ukpa Uchechi <ukpauchec...@gmail.com> 於 2025年2月13日 下午5:19 寫道： > > > > > > > > Uchechi > > > > > > -- David Arthur
