Hi David, Yes there's a GitHub team: https://github.com/orgs/apache/teams/kafka-committers
In case we still need to store the information in the repo, why do you want to put it in a separate branch and not directly in trunk? Thanks, Mickael On Wed, Dec 4, 2024 at 5:47 AM David Jacot <david.ja...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi David, > > I think that there is a « kafka committer » team within the Apache > organization. You may be able to query it. It seems to be automatically > populated based on the roaster data. > > Best, > David > > Le mar. 3 déc. 2024 à 23:52, David Arthur <mum...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > > Chia-Ping, > > > > > Do we have documentation for the manual steps? If so, I'm + 1 to create > > an > > orphaned branch to store the extra committer list, and could you please add > > this new step to the document. > > > > I don't see anything in the wiki, but I'd be happy to write that up. > > > > > Or you are talking about "approvers" > > > > Ah, yea I was thinking of "Approvers: " (which is a future discussion). > > Although, I suppose the same technique could be applied to any contributor > > (committer or not) as a way to designate their preferred name + email in > > the commit message. > > > > --- > > > > Divij, doh! Thanks. I was looking in the old "phonebook" application and > > not Whismy. Since the API requires authentication, it might be difficult to > > integrate into our automations. Maybe we could use the API to extract the > > necessary data for the "committers" file. It also looks like the > > "githubUsername" is sparsely populated, so maybe some manual labor is > > involved regardless. > > > > > > -David A > > > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 4:36 PM Divij Vaidya <divijvaidy...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Hey David > > > > > > You can find the authoritative list of committers and PMC members here - > > > https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/committee/kafka > > > If you click on usernames here, you can find the corresponding GitHub ID > > as > > > well. > > > > > > Whimsy has its API documented at https://whimsy.apache.org/docs/api/ , > > > hence, it may be possible to query the API and get the information > > directly > > > from the source of truth. I haven't tried this approach but throwing out > > an > > > option out there. > > > > > > -- > > > Divij Vaidya > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 9:51 PM Chia-Ping Tsai <chia7...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > hi David, > > > > > > > > (I copy your response from PR to here) > > > > > > > > > There's already a lot of manual steps involved in becoming a > > committer. > > > > > > > > Do we have documentation for the manual steps? If so, I'm + 1 to create > > > an > > > > orphaned branch to store the extra committer list, and could you please > > > add > > > > this new step to the document. > > > > > > > > > Generating "Reviewers:" strings automatically. > > > > > > > > We already have `reviewers.py` which can generate the strings. Or you > > are > > > > taking about "approvers"? ( > > > > https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/17881#discussion_r1854582483) > > > > Best, > > > > Chia-Ping > > > > > > > > David Arthur <mum...@gmail.com> 於 2024年12月4日 週三 上午4:40寫道： > > > > > > > > > Hey folks, as part of https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/17881 I > > > found > > > > > myself in need of a list of github usernames that belonged to Kafka > > > > > committers. As far as I know, there is no such mapping defined > > > anywhere. > > > > > > > > > > I would like to create a new branch that contains a config file that > > > lets > > > > > us map GH users to their display name and emails. I have already > > > compiled > > > > > the data on my fork > > > https://github.com/mumrah/kafka/tree/asf-committers. > > > > > This was derived from the ASF roster and some manual searching in the > > > Git > > > > > log and GitHub PRs. > > > > > > > > > > Chia-Ping raised a good point about divergence between this data and > > > the > > > > > committers.html file > > > > > https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/17881#issuecomment-2513252954. > > > > > > > > > > In addition to the PR triage workflow, I can think of some additional > > > use > > > > > cases: > > > > > > > > > > * Generating committers.html from this data set > > > > > * Generating "Reviewers:" strings automatically. > > > > > > > > > > I was wondering what folks thought about this. I can't easily raise a > > > PR > > > > > for review since the proposal here is to create a new orphaned > > branch. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > David A > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > David Arthur > >
