Hi Bill,
Thanks for addressing, looks good to me. Looking forward to implementation.

Regards,
Apoorv Mittal


On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 8:14 PM Bill Bejeck <bbej...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Apoorv,
>
> Good call, I've updated the compatibility section with text about using
> older brokers.
>
> -Bill
>
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 1:30 PM Apoorv Mittal <apoorvmitta...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Bill,
> > Thanks for the details. Sounds good to me.
> >
> > One last question:
> >
> > AM5: Do we need to capture any details around compatibility with older
> > brokers which don't support KIP-714 or when telemetry APIs are not
> enabled
> > on brokers (no configured receiver plugin)?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Apoorv Mittal
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 10:22 PM Bill Bejeck <bbej...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Apoorv,
> > >
> > > Thank you for the discussion! Here are my responses to your follow-up
> > > questions:
> > >
> > > AM2: My apologies for the previous response; I misunderstood the
> > question.
> > > When executing the `registerMetricsForSubscription,`  it is up to the
> > > developer to provide all metrics that could possibly be in a
> subscription
> > > request. For example, Kafka Streams will provide all stream metrics,
> thus
> > > supporting any subscription changes at runtime. I'll clarify this in
> the
> > > KIP.
> > >
> > > AM3: I understand your point, but I'm not convinced this will be an
> issue
> > > right now.   But given it is an implementation detail, I'd like to
> defer
> > > addressing this issue in the PR phase, where we can thoroughly test and
> > > adjust accordingly.  Is that acceptable for you?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Bill
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 3:34 PM Apoorv Mittal <
> apoorvmitta...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Bill,
> > > > Thanks for the answers, some follow ups.
> > > >
> > > > AM2: If we will only register subscribed metrics, as per the
> > subscription
> > > > received from the broker, then are we going to call the
> > > > `registerMetricsForSubscription` post to GetTelemetrySubscription
> > > response
> > > > from the broker? Also how do we manage the dynamic update of
> subscribed
> > > > metrics with this approach i.e. subscribed metrics can change at
> > runtime
> > > > then are we going to re-register additional metrics from external
> > > > applications?
> > > >
> > > > AM3: Sounds good. I understand that Streams JMXReporter will emit
> > Streams
> > > > metrics and individual client JMXReporter will emit respective client
> > > > metrics. But currently in the clients, all the metrics in mbean are
> > > > evaluated by JMXReporter and KafkaMetricsCollector, though it's an
> > > > implementation detail but I am not sure if we register external
> > > application
> > > > metrics in client, by registerMetricsForSubscription, then how we
> will
> > > > differentiate with external application metrics while emitting
> through
> > > > JMXReporter of clients.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Apoorv Mittal
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 8:09 PM Bill Bejeck <bbej...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Apoorv,
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for reading the KIP and commenting.  Here are my answers to
> > your
> > > > > comments/questions:
> > > > >
> > > > > AM1: Good point; I'll update the Javadoc in the KIP to be more
> > > specific.
> > > > >
> > > > > AM2: I'm not sure I follow, but IIUC, then yes, this method will
> only
> > > > > subscribe telemetry metrics.
> > > > >
> > > > > AM3: The `registerMetricsForSubscription` method only subscribes
> > > metrics
> > > > > for telemetry reporting; it does not give them to the JMX reporter.
> > > The
> > > > > application implementer is responsible for providing metrics to any
> > > other
> > > > > reporter.  For example, when starting an application, Kafka Streams
> > > > > separately exposes all its metrics to a JMX reporter.
> > > > >
> > > > > AM4: Great question.  I'll assert we still need the
> > > `enable.metrics.push`
> > > > > configuration to toggle pushing Kafka Streams telemetry metrics.
> To
> > > > change
> > > > > the metrics of the embedded Kafka clients within Kafka Streams,
> users
> > > > will
> > > > > use the current mechanism to update client configuration settings.
> > > I'll
> > > > > update the KIP to clarify these details.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Bill
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 6:30 AM Apoorv Mittal <
> > > apoorvmitta...@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Bill,
> > > > > > Thanks for the KIP and it's great to see a way applications can
> > also
> > > > send
> > > > > > telemetry metrics over the KIP-714 pipeline.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > A couple of questions:
> > > > > > AM1: The Javadoc for the method seems to be a bit vague, it talks
> > > about
> > > > > > "subscription" but do we need to be a bit more detailed regarding
> > > which
> > > > > > subscription we refer to?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > AM2: Are we going to only register KIP-714 subscribed metrics
> with
> > > this
> > > > > > method?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > AM3: Are the additional registered metrics available on JMX
> > reporter
> > > as
> > > > > > well or are we going to only register additional metrics for
> > KIP-714
> > > > > > telemetry pipeline?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > AM4: StreamsConfig also defines `enable.metrics.push`, do we need
> > > that
> > > > > > config or rely on client metric push config? Or all the clients
> > will
> > > > > > inherit the `enable.metrics.push` defined for Streams?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > Apoorv Mittal
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 10:21 AM Bruno Cadonna <
> cado...@apache.org
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Bill,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks for the KIP!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > BC1
> > > > > > > I find the name registerAdditionalMetrics() not specific
> enough.
> > It
> > > > is
> > > > > > > not clear that the passed-in metrics are made available for
> > > > > > > subscription. What about registerMetricsForSubscription()?
> > > > > > > The Additional part is confusing in my opinion: additional to
> > what?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > BC2
> > > > > > > Does the KIP need a transformation rule from MetricName to
> > > > > > > OpenTelemetry-compatible names that are exposed at the broker
> for
> > > > > > > subscription and retrieval?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > Bruno
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 8/20/24 12:43 AM, Bill Bejeck wrote:
> > > > > > > > Hi Lucas, thanks for the comments.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> LB1
> > > > > > > > Yes, I'll update the KIP signature to `? extends Metric`
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> LB2
> > > > > > > > If `enable.metrics.push` is disabled, the metrics passed in
> are
> > > > > > ignored.
> > > > > > > > Thinking about this now, I'm considering updating the return
> > type
> > > > of
> > > > > > > > `registerAdditionalMetrics` to a `boolean` from `void`, true
> if
> > > the
> > > > > > > metrics
> > > > > > > > have been successfully applied and false otherwise.
> > > > > > > > WDYT?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > > > Bill
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 11:33 AM Lucas Brutschy
> > > > > > > > <lbruts...@confluent.io.invalid> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> Hi Bill!
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Thanks for the KIP! I like this solution, it's general
> enough
> > > for
> > > > > many
> > > > > > > >> kinds of application.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> LB1: Could we accept an instance of the Metric interface
> > instead
> > > > of
> > > > > > > >> KafkaMetric? No strong reason to do it, it would just make
> the
> > > > > > > >> interface slightly more generic.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> LB2: What is the behavior is `enable.metrics.push` is
> > disabled?
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Cheers,
> > > > > > > >> Lucas
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 9:30 PM Bill Bejeck <
> > bbej...@apache.org>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>> Hi all,
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>> I would like to start a discussion thread on KIP-1076 to
> > enable
> > > > > > metrics
> > > > > > > >>> collection for applications that embed a Kafka client.
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>> The KIP can be found here:
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1076%3A++Metrics+for+client+applications+KIP-714+extension
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>> I look forward to the discussion and your feedback.
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>> Thanks,
> > > > > > > >>> Bill
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to