[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1560?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14097986#comment-14097986
]
Neha Narkhede edited comment on KAFKA-1560 at 8/15/14 12:45 AM:
----------------------------------------------------------------
Just a test
Created reviewboard https://reviews.apache.org/r/24726/
against branch trunk
was (Author: nehanarkhede):
Created reviewboard https://reviews.apache.org/r/24726/
against branch trunk
> Make arguments to jira-python API more explicit in kafka-patch-review's
> get_jira()
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: KAFKA-1560
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1560
> Project: Kafka
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Jonathan Natkins
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: KAFKA-1560.patch, KAFKA-1560.patch
>
>
> I ran into an issue with kafka-patch-review.py as a result of a change in
> parameters for the JIRA() object between jira-python 0.28 and 0.29. A quick
> fix is to make parameters more explicit.
> As a side note, there is a separate bug affecting the review tool, but I'm
> not sure it's fixable without modifying the jira-python source
> (https://bitbucket.org/bspeakmon/jira-python/issue/122/clientissue-function-needs-param-removal)
> It seems the answer is that people should not use jira-python 0.29 yet, since
> it's a little broken.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
