Hi Roman,

Thanks for the KIP! This would be a useful improvement.

Ideally you want to make a concerte proposal in the KIP instead of
listing a series of options. Currently the KIP seems to list two
alternatives.

Also a KIP focuses on the API changes rather than on the pure
implementation. It seems you're proposing adding a configuration to
the DropHeaders SMT. It would be good to describe that new
configuration. For example see KIP-911 which also added a
configuration.

Thanks,
Mickael

On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 9:50 AM Roman Schmitz <roman.schm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Ok, thanks for the feedback! I added a few more details and code examples
> to explain the proposed changes.
>
> Thanks,
> Roman
>
> Am So., 15. Okt. 2023 um 22:12 Uhr schrieb Andrew Schofield <
> andrew_schofield_j...@outlook.com>:
>
> > Hi Roman,
> > Thanks for the KIP. I think it’s an interesting idea, but I think the KIP
> > document needs some
> > more details added before it’s ready for review. For example, here’s a KIP
> > in the same
> > area which was delivered in an earlier version of Kafka. I think this is a
> > good KIP to copy
> > for a suitable level of detail and description (
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-585%3A+Filter+and+Conditional+SMTs
> > ).
> >
> > Hope this helps.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Andrew
> >
> > > On 15 Oct 2023, at 21:02, Roman Schmitz <roman.schm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > While working with different customers I came across the case several
> > times
> > > that we'd like to not only explicitly remove headers by name but by
> > pattern
> > > / regexp. Here is a KIP for this feature!
> > >
> > > Please let me know if you have any comments, questions, or suggestions!
> > >
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/oYtEE
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Roman
> >
> >

Reply via email to