Hi Mickael, Good catch. I fixed that and one other (similar) case (they were remnants of an earlier version of the proposal).
Ismael On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 8:59 AM Mickael Maison <mickael.mai...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Ismael, > > I'm +1 (binding) too. > > One small typo, the KIP states "The remaining modules (clients, > streams, connect, tools, etc.) will continue to support Java 11.". I > think we want to remove support for Java 11 in the tools module so it > shouldn't be listed here. > > Thanks, > Mickael > > On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 11:09 AM Divij Vaidya <divijvaidy...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > -- > > Divij Vaidya > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 11:06 AM Viktor Somogyi-Vass > > <viktor.somo...@cloudera.com.invalid> wrote: > > > > > Hi Ismael, > > > > > > I think it's important to make this change, the youtube video you > posted on > > > the discussion thread makes very good arguments and so does the KIP. > Java 8 > > > is almost a liability and Java 11 already has smaller (and decreasing) > > > adoption than 17. It's a +1 (binding) from me. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Viktor > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 7:00 AM Kamal Chandraprakash < > > > kamal.chandraprak...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding). > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 8:01 AM Satish Duggana < > satish.dugg...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Thanks Ismael for the proposal. > > > > > > > > > > Adopting JDK 17 enhances developer productivity and has reached a > > > > > level of maturity that has led to its adoption by several other > major > > > > > projects, signifying its reliability and effectiveness. > > > > > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~Satish. > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 3 Jan 2024 at 06:59, Justine Olshan > > > > > <jols...@confluent.io.invalid> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for driving this. > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 (binding) from me. > > > > > > > > > > > > Justine > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 4:30 PM Ismael Juma <m...@ismaeljuma.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I would like to start a vote on KIP-1013. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As stated in the discussion thread, this KIP was proposed > after the > > > > KIP > > > > > > > freeze for Apache Kafka 3.7, but it is purely a documentation > > > update > > > > > (if we > > > > > > > decide to adopt it) and I believe it would serve our users > best if > > > we > > > > > > > communicate the deprecation for removal sooner (i.e. 3.7) > rather > > > than > > > > > later > > > > > > > (i.e. 3.8). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please take a look and cast your vote. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Link: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=284789510 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ismael > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
