Hi,

Unit/Integration tests:
I'm not able to get a clean build but looking at the results from
builds 122 [0] and 123 [1], it seems all tests apart
ClusterConnectionStatesTest.testSingleIP() passed at least once.
We have https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-15762 to track the
testSingleIP() failures.

System tests:
Thanks Justine for sharing your results. I've put my results in
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1PDBoCHTYSEvYd1ShYbjYVNpF0Hk0P4M3?usp=drive_link
Combining our results together, all tests passed apart from the 9
tests from tests/client/quota_test.py. I've managed to get them to
pass on my laptop and attached the output in the drive folder.
I opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-15973 to track this issue.

I'm now closing the vote. The vote passes with
- 3 +1 bindings votes from Bill, Luke, and Justine
- 4 +1 non-binding votes from Jakub, Federico, Kamal and Josep
- 0 -1 votes

I'll go ahead and finish the release process.

Thanks,
Mickael

0: https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Kafka/job/kafka/job/3.6/122/testReport/
1: https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Kafka/job/kafka/job/3.6/123/testReport/


On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 4:25 PM Mickael Maison <mickael.mai...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks David for investigating this issue.
> If it's not a regression and if it's not a critical bug then I agree
> that it's not a blocker.
>
> Mickael
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 7:16 AM Justine Olshan
> <jols...@confluent.io.invalid> wrote:
> >
> > Not sure if all folks can see this link but the results are here:
> > https://confluent-kafka-branch-builder-system-test-results.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/system-test-kafka-branch-builder--1701739886--apache--3.6--ec5faaa90d/2023-12-04--001./2023-12-04--001./report.html
> >
> >
> > Looks like there were a few failures but most of them were due to known
> > versioning issues with tests (ie the dev version string causes issues when
> > trying to assert on it or versions 2.6.3, 2.7.2, and 3.3.2 are not in the
> > tests -- see PR here where I tried to fix this
> > https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/14641) I believe the quota tests have
> > also been broken for a while and I've talked to folks about fixing them in
> > the past.
> >
> > Taking in the dev (3.6.1-SNAPSHOT), 2.6.3, 2.7.2, and 3.3.2, and the quota
> > tests I think the failures look reasonable.
> >
> > +1 binding from me given I did the previous validations.
> >
> > Justine
> >
> > P.S. I will get to that versioning fix again soon!
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 2:10 PM Justine Olshan <jols...@confluent.io> wrote:
> >
> > > Just wanted to give an update on the system tests since I said I started
> > > mine last week. I accidentally misconfigured my build, so I restarted them
> > > today. I should have results and if things look good, I should be able to
> > > make a vote early tomorrow.
> > >
> > > Justine
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 1:55 PM David Arthur
> > > <david.art...@confluent.io.invalid> wrote:
> > >
> > >> I have a fix for KAFKA-15968
> > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-15968> here
> > >> https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/14919/. After a bit of digging, I
> > >> found that this behavior has existed in the KRaft controller since the
> > >> beginning, so it is not a regression.
> > >>
> > >> Another thing I observed while investigating this is that MetadataLoader
> > >> *does* treat CorruptRecordExceptions as fatal, which leads to the crash 
> > >> we
> > >> want. RaftClient calls handleCommit serially for all its listeners, so if
> > >> QuorumController#handleCommit is called first and does not crash, the 
> > >> call
> > >> to MetadataLoader#handleCommit will crash.
> > >>
> > >> Considering these two factors, I don't strongly feel like we need to 
> > >> block
> > >> the release for this fix.
> > >>
> > >> -David
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 10:49 AM David Arthur <david.art...@confluent.io>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Mickael,
> > >> >
> > >> > I just filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-15968 while
> > >> > investigating a log corruption issue on the controller. I'm still
> > >> > investigating the issue to see how far back this goes, but I think this
> > >> > could be a blocker.
> > >> >
> > >> > Essentially, the bug is that the controller does not treat a
> > >> > CorruptRecordException as fatal, so the process will continue running.
> > >> If
> > >> > this happens on an active controller, it could corrupt the cluster's
> > >> > metadata in general (since missing a single metadata record can cause
> > >> lots
> > >> > of downstream problems).
> > >> >
> > >> > I'll update this thread by the end of day with a stronger
> > >> > blocker/non-blocker opinion.
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks,
> > >> > David
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 6:48 AM Luke Chen <show...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> Hi Mickael:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> I did:
> > >> >>    1. Validated all checksums, signatures, and hashes
> > >> >>    2. Ran quick start for KRaft using scala 2.12 artifacts
> > >> >>    3. Spot checked the documentation and Javadoc
> > >> >>    4. Validated the licence file
> > >> >>
> > >> >> When running the validation to scala 2.12 package, I found these
> > >> libraries
> > >> >> are missing: (We only include scala 2.13 libraries in licence file)
> > >> >> scala-java8-compat_2.12-1.0.2 is missing in license file
> > >> >> scala-library-2.12.18 is missing in license file
> > >> >> scala-logging_2.12-3.9.4 is missing in license file
> > >> >> scala-reflect-2.12.18 is missing in license file
> > >> >>
> > >> >> It looks like this issue has been there for a long time, so it won't
> > >> be a
> > >> >> block issue for v3.6.1.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> +1 (binding) from me.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Thank you.
> > >> >> Luke
> > >> >>
> > >> >> On Sat, Dec 2, 2023 at 5:46 AM Bill Bejeck <bbej...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> > Hi Mickael,
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > I did the following:
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >    1. Validated all checksums, signatures, and hashes
> > >> >> >    2. Built from source
> > >> >> >    3. Ran all the unit tests
> > >> >> >    4. Spot checked the documentation and Javadoc
> > >> >> >    5. Ran the ZK, Kraft, and Kafka Streams quickstart guides
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > I did notice that the `fillDotVersion` in `js/templateData.js` needs
> > >> >> > updating to `3.6.1`, but this is minor and should not block the
> > >> release.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > It's a +1(binding) for me, pending the successful system test run
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > Thanks,
> > >> >> > Bill
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 1:49 PM Justine Olshan
> > >> >> <jols...@confluent.io.invalid
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > wrote:
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > > I've started a system test run on my end.
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > > Justine
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 1:55 PM Justine Olshan <
> > >> jols...@confluent.io>
> > >> >> > > wrote:
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > > > I built from source and ran a simple transactional produce
> > >> bench. I
> > >> >> > ran a
> > >> >> > > > handful of unit tests as well.
> > >> >> > > > I scanned the docs and everything looked reasonable.
> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >> > > > I was wondering if we got the system test results mentioned >
> > >> System
> > >> >> > > > tests: Still running I'll post an update once they complete.
> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >> > > > Justine
> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >> > > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 6:33 AM Mickael Maison <
> > >> >> > mickael.mai...@gmail.com
> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >> > > > wrote:
> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >> > > >> Hi Josep,
> > >> >> > > >>
> > >> >> > > >> Good catch!
> > >> >> > > >> If it's the only issue we find, I don't think we should block
> > >> the
> > >> >> > > >> release just to fix that.
> > >> >> > > >>
> > >> >> > > >> If we find another issue, I'll backport it before running
> > >> another
> > >> >> RC,
> > >> >> > > >> otherwise I'll backport it once 3.6.1 is released.
> > >> >> > > >>
> > >> >> > > >> Thanks,
> > >> >> > > >> Mickael
> > >> >> > > >>
> > >> >> > > >> On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 11:55 AM Josep Prat
> > >> >> > <josep.p...@aiven.io.invalid
> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >> > > >> wrote:
> > >> >> > > >> >
> > >> >> > > >> > Hi Mickael,
> > >> >> > > >> > This PR[1] made me realize NOTICE-binary is missing the 
> > >> >> > > >> > notice
> > >> >> for
> > >> >> > > >> > commons-io. I don't know if it's a blocker or not. I can
> > >> cherry
> > >> >> pick
> > >> >> > > the
> > >> >> > > >> > commit to the 3.6 branch if you want.
> > >> >> > > >> >
> > >> >> > > >> > Best,
> > >> >> > > >> >
> > >> >> > > >> >
> > >> >> > > >> > [1]: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/14865
> > >> >> > > >> >
> > >> >> > > >> > On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 10:25 AM Josep Prat <
> > >> josep.p...@aiven.io
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > > >> wrote:
> > >> >> > > >> >
> > >> >> > > >> > > Hi Mickael,
> > >> >> > > >> > > Thanks for running the release. It's a +1 for me
> > >> (non-binding).
> > >> >> > > >> > > I did the following:
> > >> >> > > >> > > - Verified artifact's signatures and hashes
> > >> >> > > >> > > - Checked JavaDoc (with navigation to Oracle JavaDoc)
> > >> >> > > >> > > - Compiled source code
> > >> >> > > >> > > - Run unit tests and integration tests
> > >> >> > > >> > > - Run getting started with ZK and KRaft
> > >> >> > > >> > >
> > >> >> > > >> > > Best,
> > >> >> > > >> > >
> > >> >> > > >> > > On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 8:51 AM Kamal Chandraprakash <
> > >> >> > > >> > > kamal.chandraprak...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >> > > >> > >
> > >> >> > > >> > >> +1 (non-binding)
> > >> >> > > >> > >>
> > >> >> > > >> > >> 1. Built the source from 3.6.1-rc0 tag in scala 2.12 and
> > >> 2.13
> > >> >> > > >> > >> 2. Ran all the unit and integration tests.
> > >> >> > > >> > >> 3. Ran quickstart and verified the produce-consume on a 3
> > >> node
> > >> >> > > >> cluster.
> > >> >> > > >> > >> 4. Verified the tiered storage functionality with
> > >> local-tiered
> > >> >> > > >> storage.
> > >> >> > > >> > >>
> > >> >> > > >> > >> On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 12:55 AM Federico Valeri <
> > >> >> > > >> fedeval...@gmail.com>
> > >> >> > > >> > >> wrote:
> > >> >> > > >> > >>
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > Hi Mickael,
> > >> >> > > >> > >> >
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > - Build from source (Java 17, Scala 2.13)
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > - Run unit and integration tests
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > - Run custom client apps using staging artifacts
> > >> >> > > >> > >> >
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > +1 (non binding)
> > >> >> > > >> > >> >
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > Thanks
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > Fede
> > >> >> > > >> > >> >
> > >> >> > > >> > >> >
> > >> >> > > >> > >> >
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > On Sun, Nov 26, 2023 at 11:34 AM Jakub Scholz <
> > >> >> ja...@scholz.cz
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > > >> wrote:
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > >
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > > +1 non-binding. I used the staged Scala 2.13 artifacts
> > >> and
> > >> >> > the
> > >> >> > > >> staged
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > Maven
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > > repo for my tests. All seems to work fine.
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > >
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > > Thanks
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > > Jakub
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > >
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > > On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 4:37 PM Mickael Maison <
> > >> >> > > >> mimai...@apache.org>
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > wrote:
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > >
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > > > Hello Kafka users, developers and client-developers,
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > > >
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > > > This is the first candidate for release of Apache
> > >> Kafka
> > >> >> > > 3.6.1.
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > > >
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > > > This is a bugfix release with several fixes,
> > >> including
> > >> >> > > >> dependency
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > > > version bumps for CVEs.
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > > >
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > > > Release notes for the 3.6.1 release:
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > > >
> > >> >> > > >> > >>
> > >> >> > >
> > >> https://home.apache.org/~mimaison/kafka-3.6.1-rc0/RELEASE_NOTES.html
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > > >
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > > > *** Please download, test and vote by Friday,
> > >> December 1
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > > >
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > > > Kafka's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign
> > >> the
> > >> >> > > >> release:
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > > > https://kafka.apache.org/KEYS
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > > >
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > > > * Release artifacts to be voted upon (source and
> > >> >> binary):
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > > > https://home.apache.org/~mimaison/kafka-3.6.1-rc0/
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > > >
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > > > * Maven artifacts to be voted upon:
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > > >
> > >> >> > > >> > >>
> > >> >> > > >>
> > >> >> >
> > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/kafka/
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > > >
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > > > * Javadoc:
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > > >
> > >> >> https://home.apache.org/~mimaison/kafka-3.6.1-rc0/javadoc/
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > > >
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > > > * Tag to be voted upon (off 3.6 branch) is the 3.6.1
> > >> >> tag:
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > > >
> > >> https://github.com/apache/kafka/releases/tag/3.6.1-rc0
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > > >
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > > > PR for updating docs:
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > > > https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/pull/568
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > > >
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > > > * Documentation:
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > > > https://kafka.apache.org/36/documentation.html
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > > >
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > > > * Protocol:
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > > > https://kafka.apache.org/36/protocol.html
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > > >
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > > > * Successful Jenkins builds for the 3.6 branch:
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > > > Unit/integration tests: We still have a lot of flaky
> > >> >> tests
> > >> >> > in
> > >> >> > > >> the
> > >> >> > > >> > >> 3.6
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > > > branch. Looking at the last few 3.6 builds in
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > > >
> > >> >> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Kafka/job/kafka/job/3.6/
> > >> >> > it
> > >> >> > > >> seems
> > >> >> > > >> > >> all
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > > > tests passed at least once apart from
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > > > ClusterConnectionStatesTest.testSingleIP(). There's
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-15762 to
> > >> >> fix
> > >> >> > > that
> > >> >> > > >> test.
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > > > System tests: Still running I'll post an update once
> > >> >> they
> > >> >> > > >> complete.
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > > >
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > > > Thanks,
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > > > Mickael
> > >> >> > > >> > >> > > >
> > >> >> > > >> > >> >
> > >> >> > > >> > >>
> > >> >> > > >> > >
> > >> >> > > >> > >
> > >> >> > > >> > > --
> > >> >> > > >> > > [image: Aiven] <https://www.aiven.io>
> > >> >> > > >> > >
> > >> >> > > >> > > *Josep Prat*
> > >> >> > > >> > > Open Source Engineering Director, *Aiven*
> > >> >> > > >> > > josep.p...@aiven.io   |   +491715557497
> > >> >> > > >> > > aiven.io <https://www.aiven.io>   |
> > >> >> > > >> > > <https://www.facebook.com/aivencloud>
> > >> >> > > >> > > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/aiven/>   <
> > >> >> > > >> https://twitter.com/aiven_io>
> > >> >> > > >> > > *Aiven Deutschland GmbH*
> > >> >> > > >> > > Alexanderufer 3-7, 10117 Berlin
> > >> >> > > >> > > Geschäftsführer: Oskari Saarenmaa & Hannu Valtonen
> > >> >> > > >> > > Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 209739 B
> > >> >> > > >> > >
> > >> >> > > >> >
> > >> >> > > >> >
> > >> >> > > >> > --
> > >> >> > > >> > [image: Aiven] <https://www.aiven.io>
> > >> >> > > >> >
> > >> >> > > >> > *Josep Prat*
> > >> >> > > >> > Open Source Engineering Director, *Aiven*
> > >> >> > > >> > josep.p...@aiven.io   |   +491715557497
> > >> >> > > >> > aiven.io <https://www.aiven.io>   |   <
> > >> >> > > >> https://www.facebook.com/aivencloud>
> > >> >> > > >> >   <https://www.linkedin.com/company/aiven/>   <
> > >> >> > > >> https://twitter.com/aiven_io>
> > >> >> > > >> > *Aiven Deutschland GmbH*
> > >> >> > > >> > Alexanderufer 3-7, 10117 Berlin
> > >> >> > > >> > Geschäftsführer: Oskari Saarenmaa & Hannu Valtonen
> > >> >> > > >> > Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 209739 B
> > >> >> > > >>
> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> >
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > -David
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> -David
> > >>
> > >

Reply via email to