+1 (binding) Thanks for the kip Alieh!
Walker On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 3:52 AM Bruno Cadonna <cado...@apache.org> wrote: > Thanks for the KIP, Alieh! > > +1 (binding) > > Best, > Bruno > > On 10/10/23 1:14 AM, Matthias J. Sax wrote: > > One more nit: as discussed on the related KIP-698 thread, we should not > > use `get` as prefix for the getters. > > > > So it should be `K key()` and `Optional<Instant> asOfTimestamp()`. > > > > > > Otherwise the KIP LGTM. > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > -Matthias > > > > On 10/6/23 2:50 AM, Alieh Saeedi wrote: > >> Hi everyone, > >> > >> Since KIP-960 is reduced to the simplest IQ type and all further > comments > >> are related to the following-up KIPs, I decided to finalize it at this > >> point. > >> > >> > >> A huge thank you to everyone who has reviewed this KIP (and also the > >> following-up ones), and > >> participated in the discussion thread! > >> > >> I'd also like to thank you in advance for taking the time to vote. > >> > >> Best, > >> Alieh > >> >
