ok, I will update it. Thank you  Matthias

Sincerely,
Hanyu

On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 11:23 AM Matthias J. Sax <mj...@apache.org> wrote:

> Thanks for the KIP Hanyu!
>
>
> I took a quick look and it think the proposal makes sense overall.
>
> A few comments about how to structure the KIP.
>
> As you propose to not add `ReverseRangQuery` class, the code example
> should go into "Rejected Alternatives" section, not in the "Proposed
> Changes" section.
>
> For the `RangeQuery` code example, please omit all existing methods etc,
> and only include what will be added/changed. This make it simpler to
> read the KIP.
>
>
> nit: typo
>
> >  the fault value is false
>
> Should be "the default value is false".
>
>
> Not sure if `setReverse()` is the best name. Maybe `withDescandingOrder`
> (or similar, I guess `withReverseOrder` would also work) might be
> better? Would be good to align to KIP-969 proposal that suggest do use
> `withDescendingKeys` methods for "reverse key-range"; if we go with
> `withReverseOrder` we should change KIP-969 accordingly.
>
> Curious to hear what others think about naming this consistently across
> both KIPs.
>
>
> -Matthias
>
>
> On 10/3/23 9:17 AM, Hanyu (Peter) Zheng wrote:
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-985%3A+Add+reverseRange+and+reverseAll+query+over+kv-store+in+IQv2
> >
>


-- 

[image: Confluent] <https://www.confluent.io>
Hanyu (Peter) Zheng he/him/his
Software Engineer Intern
+1 (213) 431-7193 <+1+(213)+431-7193>
Follow us: [image: Blog]
<https://www.confluent.io/blog?utm_source=footer&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=ch.email-signature_type.community_content.blog>[image:
Twitter] <https://twitter.com/ConfluentInc>[image: LinkedIn]
<https://www.linkedin.com/in/hanyu-peter-zheng/>[image: Slack]
<https://slackpass.io/confluentcommunity>[image: YouTube]
<https://youtube.com/confluent>

[image: Try Confluent Cloud for Free]
<https://www.confluent.io/get-started?utm_campaign=tm.fm-apac_cd.inbound&utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=organic>

Reply via email to