Hi Satish,

Do you have a sense of when we'll publish RC0?

Thanks,
Ismael

On Fri, Sep 8, 2023 at 6:27 AM David Arthur
<david.art...@confluent.io.invalid> wrote:

> Quick update on my two blockers: KAFKA-15435 is merged to trunk and
> cherry-picked to 3.6. I have a PR open for KAFKA-15441 and will hopefully
> get it merged today.
>
> -David
>
> On Fri, Sep 8, 2023 at 5:26 AM Ivan Yurchenko <i...@ivanyu.me> wrote:
>
> > Hi Satish and all,
> >
> > I wonder if https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-14993 should be
> > included in the 3.6 release plan. I'm thinking that when implemented, it
> > would be a small, but still a change in the RSM contract: throw an
> > exception instead of returning an empty InputStream. Maybe it should be
> > included right away to save the migration later? What do you think?
> >
> > Best,
> > Ivan
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 8, 2023, at 02:52, Satish Duggana wrote:
> > > Hi Jose,
> > > Thanks for looking into this issue and resolving it with a quick fix.
> > >
> > > ~Satish.
> > >
> > > On Thu, 7 Sept 2023 at 21:40, José Armando García Sancio
> > > <jsan...@confluent.io.invalid> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Satish,
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 4:58 PM Satish Duggana <
> > satish.dugg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Greg,
> > > > > It seems https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-14273 has
> been
> > > > > there in 3.5.x too.
> > > >
> > > > I also agree that it should be a blocker for 3.6.0. It should have
> > > > been a blocker for those previous releases. I didn't fix it because,
> > > > unfortunately, I wasn't aware of the issue and jira.
> > > > I'll create a PR with a fix in case the original author doesn't
> > respond in time.
> > > >
> > > > Satish, do you agree?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks!
> > > > --
> > > > -José
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> -David
>

Reply via email to