Hi Abhijeet,

Thanks for the KIP!
I don't have much preference for the name changing.
But if it could confuse other people, it's good to make it clear.

Thank you.
Luke

On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 2:53 PM Abhijeet Kumar <abhijeet.cse....@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Kamal,
>
> As we discussed offline, I will rename this KIP so that it only captures
> the aspect of renaming the previously added metrics to remove ambiguity.
> I will create another KIP for RemoteIndexCache metrics and other relevant
> tiered storage metrics.
>
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 12:03 PM Kamal Chandraprakash <
> kamal.chandraprak...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Abhijeet,
> >
> > Thanks for the KIP!
> >
> > We are changing the metric names from what was proposed in the KIP-405
> and
> > adding new metrics for RemoteIndexCache.
> > In the KIP, it's not clear whether we are renaming the aggregate broker
> > level metrics for remote copy/fetch/failed-copy/failed-fetch.
> >
> > Are these metrics enough to monitor all the aspects of tiered storage?
> >
> > (eg)
> > 1. Metrics to see the Tier Lag Status by number of pending
> > segments/records.
> > 2. Similar to log-start-offset and log-end-offset metrics.  Should we
> > expose local-log-start-offset and
> highest-offset-uploaded-to-remote-storage
> > as metric?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Kamal
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 2:08 PM Abhijeet Kumar <
> abhijeet.cse....@gmail.com
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > I created KIP-930 for adding RemoteIndexCache stats and also to rename
> > some
> > > tiered storage metrics added as part of KIP-405
> > > <
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-405%3A+Kafka+Tiered+Storage#KIP405:KafkaTieredStorage-NewMetrics
> > > >
> > > to remove ambiguity.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-930%3A+Tiered+Storage+Metrics
> > >
> > > Feedback and suggestions are welcome.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Abhijeet.
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Abhijeet.
>

Reply via email to