Thank you for response Divij. 1. We are going to use ASF infra provided nodes for better availability and stability as there are 3 power9 nodes managed officially by ASF infra team themselves. Ref: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-24663 https://jenkins-ccos.apache.org/view/Shared%20-%20ppc64le%20nodes/ previously used power node details for apache/kafka CI: RAM- 16GB VCPUs- 8 VCPU Disk- 160GB for shared VMs we need to check with ASF infra team to provide details
2. We can run nightly builds once or twice in a day on specific period of time instead of every commit 3. apache/camel https://builds.apache.org/job/Camel/job/el/ has already enabled CI for power platform they are using same H/W resources as RAM- 16GB VCPUs- 8 VCPU Disk- 160GB -----Original Message----- From: Divij Vaidya <divijvaidy...@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, June 19, 2023 10:20 PM To: dev@kafka.apache.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-942: Add Power(ppc64le) support Thank you for the KIP Vaibhav. 1. Builds for power architecture were intentionally disabled in the past since the infrastructure was flaky [1]. Could you please add to the KIP on what has changed since then? 2. What do you think about an alternative solution where we run a nightly build for this platform instead of running the CI with every PR/commit? 3. To bolster the case for this KIP, could you please add information from other Apache projects who are already running CI for this platform? Is their CI stable on Apache Infra hosts? [1] https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/12380 -- Divij Vaidya On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 12:30 PM Vaibhav Nazare <vaibhav.naz...@ibm.com.invalid> wrote: > > INVALID URI REMOVED > confluence_display_KAFKA_KIP-2D942-253A-2BAdd-2BPower-2528ppc64le-2529 > -2Bsupport&d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=s9I3h_d72lHAurpHrTUoOkX > 8ByFHVUGD0XU1PTKfCiw&m=z6ZZ_vt5XP--aKB5lpRRZxdVMA37hD_0ch7COCLdMtLhMve > 8AJcbKfwRtBac267r&s=BQtj2lbWlu32mK0TP37XeZanal33QOf5HB1-33QJIqc&e= >
