Hi, Jeff, Thanks for the KIP. A couple of comments.
1. The comment says that KIP-915 does not bump the version of TransactionLogValue.json, but the schema seems to bump the version from 0 to 1. 2. How do we support downgrade when a field is removed? Does it require the removed field to have a default? Thanks, Jun On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 6:49 AM Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm late to this conversation, but it's a bit odd to backport the flexible > versions change to "3.0.3, 3.1.3, 3.2.4, 3.3.3, and 3.4.1" unless we intend > to release an update for each of these. So, I suggest that either we commit > to releasing an update for each of these versions or we reduce the set of > versions we backport the change to. > > Ismael > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 4:57 PM Jeff Kim <jeff....@confluent.io.invalid> > wrote: > > > Hi folks, > > > > I would like to start a discussion thread for KIP-915: Next Gen Group > > Coordinator Downgrade Path which proposes the downgrade design for the > new > > group coordinator introduced in KIP-848 > > < > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-848%3A+The+Next+Generation+of+the+Consumer+Rebalance+Protocol > > > > > . > > > > KIP: > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-915%3A+Next+Gen+Group+Coordinator+Downgrade+Path > > > > Thanks, > > Jeff > > >
