Hi Jose, I think it's reasonable to add more user-friendly metrics as you described. I'll update the KIP soon with that. I'll try to define them in a way where they track deprecated protocols for the next major release. That way, they can be useful even after AK 4.0 is released.
Ismael On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 12:34 PM José Armando García Sancio <jsan...@confluent.io.invalid> wrote: > Thanks Ismael. > > > The following metrics are used to determine both questions: > > > > > > - Client name and version: > > > > kafka.server:clientSoftwareName=(client-software-name),clientSoftwareVersion=(client-software-version),listener=(listener),networkProcessor=(processor-index),type=(type) > > > - Request name and version: > > > > kafka.network:type=RequestMetrics,name=RequestsPerSec,request=(api-name),version=(api-version)} > > > > > > > > Are you suggesting that this is too complicated and hence we should add a > > metric that tracks AK 4.0 support explicitly? > > Correct. It doesn't look trivial for the users to implement this check > against the RequestMetrics. I was wondering if it is worth it for > Kafka to implement this for them and expose a simple metric that they > can check. > > -- > -José >
