Hi everyone,

Thanks Luke.
I have submitted a PR  https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/12545, please
take a look.

Best,
ShunKang

Luke Chen <show...@gmail.com> 于2022年10月24日周一 09:56写道:

> Hi ShunKang,
> Yes, this vote can be concluded.
> You can start to implement it.
>
> Thanks.
> Luke
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 9:45 PM ShunKang Lin <linshunkang....@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > Thank you for the vote. I've got three +1 votes (Guozhang, Luke, Chris),
> > can this vote be concluded?
> >
> > Best,
> > ShunKang
> >
> > Chris Egerton <chr...@aiven.io.invalid> 于2022年10月12日周三 23:17写道:
> >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > > Thanks ShunKang!
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 9:26 PM Luke Chen <show...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 from me.
> > > > Thanks for the KIP.
> > > >
> > > > Luke
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 1:50 AM Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1, thanks ShunKang.
> > > > >
> > > > > Though its proposed motivation is on consumer fetcher's
> > > deserialization,
> > > > I
> > > > > think adding an overloaded method with ByteBuffer would help with
> > other
> > > > > serde places on the client side as well.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Guozhang
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 9:41 AM ShunKang Lin <
> > > linshunkang....@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi everyone,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'd like to open the vote for KIP-863, which proposes to reduce
> > > memory
> > > > > > allocation and memory copying in
> > Fetcher#parseRecord(TopicPartition,
> > > > > > RecordBatch, Record).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The proposal is here:
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=225152035
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks to all who reviewed the proposal, and thanks in advance
> for
> > > > taking
> > > > > > the time to vote!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > ShunKang
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > -- Guozhang
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to