Hi David,

Sorry for the delay.
I'll complete it in v3.4.0.

Thank you.
Luke

On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 3:52 PM David Jacot <dja...@confluent.io.invalid>
wrote:

> Hi Luke,
>
> Are you still interested in implementing this KIP? We need it for
> KIP-848. If you are not, we could find someone to take it over.
>
> Thanks,
> David
>
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 10:04 AM Luke Chen <show...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks, Ziming!
> >
> > So, now, this KIP vote passed with 3 binding +1 votes (David, Tom,
> > Guozhang) and 1 non-binding +1 vote (Ziming).
> > The vote will be closed.
> >
> > Thanks again.
> > Luke
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 5:00 PM deng ziming <dengziming1...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Thank you Luke for this work,
> > > I’m +1(non-binding)
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best,
> > > Ziming Deng
> > >
> > > > On Dec 1, 2021, at 8:36 AM, Luke Chen <show...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > I'd like to start the vote for KIP-792: Add "generation" field into
> > > > consumer protocol.
> > > >
> > > > The goal of this KIP is to allow the assignor/consumer coordinator to
> > > have
> > > > a way to identify the out-of-date members/assignments, to avoid
> rebalance
> > > > stuck issues in current protocol.
> > > >
> > > > Detailed description can be found here:
> > > >
> > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=191336614
> > > >
> > > > Any feedback is welcome.
> > > >
> > > > Thank you.
> > > > Luke
> > >
> > >
>

Reply via email to