Hi all, Thanks for voting on this KIP!
Taking a look at this change, I realized that rolling the cluster to apply the configuration may be difficult when the issue is ongoing. The brokers will become overloaded and it will be hard to roll. Since the configuration can be dynamic, it makes sense to make it so. This way, we can minimize impact by quickly changing the expiration (and potentially reverting it back once the issue is resolved). I've updated the KIP to reflect that the configuration should be dynamic rather than static, and that it will be updated cluster-wide. Let me know if there are any issues with this change. Thanks, Justine On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 4:07 PM Justine Olshan <jols...@confluent.io> wrote: > Hey all, > Thanks for the votes! > To summarize, we have 4 binding votes: > > - David Jacot > - Jason Gustafson > - Tom Bentley > - Luke Chen > > and one non-binding vote: > > - Sagar > > This meets the requirements for the KIP to be accepted! Thanks again! > Justine > > On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 2:13 AM Luke Chen <show...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Justine, >> >> Thanks for the KIP. >> +1 (binding) from me. >> >> Luke >> >> On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 1:44 AM Tom Bentley <tbent...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> > Hi Justine, >> > >> > Thanks again for the KIP, +1 (binding). >> > >> > >> > >> > On Tue, 9 Aug 2022 at 18:09, Jason Gustafson <ja...@confluent.io.invalid >> > >> > wrote: >> > >> > > Thanks Justine, +1 from me. >> > > >> > > On Tue, Aug 9, 2022 at 1:12 AM Sagar <sagarmeansoc...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > > >> > > > Thanks for the KIP. >> > > > >> > > > +1(non-binding) >> > > > >> > > > Sagar. >> > > > >> > > > On Tue, Aug 9, 2022 at 1:13 PM David Jacot >> <dja...@confluent.io.invalid >> > > >> > > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > Thanks for the KIP, Justine. The proposal makes sense to me. I am >> +1 >> > > > > (binding). >> > > > > >> > > > > Cheers, >> > > > > David >> > > > > >> > > > > On Mon, Aug 8, 2022 at 6:18 PM Justine Olshan >> > > > > <jols...@confluent.io.invalid> wrote: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Hi all, >> > > > > > I'd like to start a vote for KIP-854: Separate configuration for >> > > > producer >> > > > > > ID expiry. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > KIP: >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-854+Separate+configuration+for+producer+ID+expiry >> > > > > > JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-14097 >> > > > > > Discussion thread: >> > > > > > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/cz9x90883on98k082qd0tskj6yjhox1t >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Thanks, >> > > > > > Justine >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> >
