Hi, Artem,

Thanks for the reply.

The memory usage on the broker is proportional to the number of (partition,
pid) combinations. So, I am wondering if we could have a metric that
captures that. The proposed pid count metric doesn't fully capture that
since each pid could be associated with a different number of partitions.

Thanks,

Jun

On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 9:24 AM Justine Olshan <jols...@confluent.io.invalid>
wrote:

> Hi Artem,
> Thanks for the update to include motivation. Makes sense to me.
> Justine
>
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 6:51 PM Luke Chen <show...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Artem,
> >
> > Thanks for the update.
> > LGTM.
> >
> > Luke
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 6:51 AM Artem Livshits
> > <alivsh...@confluent.io.invalid> wrote:
> >
> > > Thank you for your feedback. I've updated the KIP to elaborate on the
> > > motivation and provide some background on producer ids and how we
> measure
> > > them.
> > >
> > > Also, after some thinking and discussing it offline with some folks, I
> > > think that we don't really need partitioner level metrics.  We can use
> > > existing tools to do granular debugging.  I've moved partition level
> > > metrics to the rejected alternatives section.
> > >
> > > -Artem
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 1:57 AM Luke Chen <show...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Artem,
> > > >
> > > > Could you elaborate more in the motivation section?
> > > > I'm interested to know what kind of scenarios this metric can benefit
> > > for.
> > > > What could it bring to us when a topic partition has 100
> > ProducerIdCount
> > > VS
> > > > another topic partition has 10 ProducerIdCount?
> > > >
> > > > Thank you.
> > > > Luke
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 6:30 AM Jun Rao <j...@confluent.io.invalid>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi, Artem,
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for the KIP.
> > > > >
> > > > > Could you explain the partition level ProducerIdCount a bit more?
> > Does
> > > > that
> > > > > reflect the number of PIDs ever produced to a partition since the
> > > broker
> > > > is
> > > > > started? Do we reduce the count after a PID expires?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > >
> > > > > Jun
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 1:08 AM David Jacot
> > > <dja...@confluent.io.invalid
> > > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Artem,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The KIP LGTM.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > David
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 9:32 PM Artem Livshits
> > > > > > <alivsh...@confluent.io.invalid> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If there is no other feedback I'm going to start voting in a
> > couple
> > > > > days.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -Artem
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 3:50 PM Artem Livshits <
> > > > alivsh...@confluent.io
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thank you for your feedback.  Updated the KIP and added the
> > > > Rejected
> > > > > > > > Alternatives section.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -Artem
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 1:16 PM Ismael Juma <
> ism...@juma.me.uk
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> If we don't track them separately, then it makes sense to
> keep
> > > it
> > > > as
> > > > > > one
> > > > > > > >> metric. I'd probably name it ProducerIdCount in that case.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Ismael
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 12:04 PM Artem Livshits
> > > > > > > >> <alivsh...@confluent.io.invalid> wrote:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> > Do you propose to have 2 metrics instead of one?  Right
> now
> > we
> > > > > don't
> > > > > > > >> track
> > > > > > > >> > if the producer id was transactional or idempotent and for
> > > > metric
> > > > > > > >> > collection we'd either have to pay the cost of iterating
> > over
> > > > > > producer
> > > > > > > >> ids
> > > > > > > >> > (which could be a lot) or split the producer map into 2 or
> > > cache
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > >> > counts, which complicates the code.
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > From the monitoring perspective, I think one metric should
> > be
> > > > > good,
> > > > > > but
> > > > > > > >> > maybe I'm missing some scenarios.
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > -Artem
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 12:28 AM Ismael Juma <
> > > ism...@juma.me.uk
> > > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > > I like the suggestion to have IdempotentProducerCount
> and
> > > > > > > >> > > TransactionalProducerCount metrics.
> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > >> > > Ismael
> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > >> > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 2:27 PM Artem Livshits
> > > > > > > >> > > <alivsh...@confluent.io.invalid> wrote:
> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > >> > > > Hi Ismael,
> > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > > >> > > > Thank you for your feedback.  Yes, this is counting
> the
> > > > number
> > > > > > of
> > > > > > > >> > > producer
> > > > > > > >> > > > ids tracked by the partition and broker.  Another
> > options
> > > I
> > > > > was
> > > > > > > >> > thinking
> > > > > > > >> > > of
> > > > > > > >> > > > are the following:
> > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > > >> > > > - IdempotentProducerCount
> > > > > > > >> > > > - TransactionalProducerCount
> > > > > > > >> > > > - ProducerIdCount
> > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > > >> > > > Let me know if one of these seems better, or I'm open
> to
> > > > other
> > > > > > name
> > > > > > > >> > > > suggestions as well.
> > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > > >> > > > -Artem
> > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > > >> > > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 11:49 PM Ismael Juma <
> > > > > ism...@juma.me.uk
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> > wrote:
> > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > > >> > > > > Thanks for the KIP.
> > > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > > > >> > > > > ProducerCount seems like a misleading name since
> > > producers
> > > > > > > >> without a
> > > > > > > >> > > > > producer id are not counted. Is this meant to count
> > the
> > > > > > number of
> > > > > > > >> > > > producer
> > > > > > > >> > > > > IDs tracked by the broker?
> > > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > > > >> > > > > Ismael
> > > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > > > >> > > > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2022, 3:12 PM Artem Livshits <
> > > > > > > >> alivsh...@confluent.io
> > > > > > > >> > > > > .invalid>
> > > > > > > >> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> > > > > > I'd like to start a discussion on the KIP-847:
> > > > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-847%3A+Add+ProducerCount+metrics
> > > > > > > >> > > > > > .
> > > > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> > > > > > -Artem
> > > > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to