> > Why does the title of the KIP talk about task-level metrics, but the > specified metrics are on processor-level?
Ah, my mistake -- it should indeed say "processor-level metrics". Thanks for the catch Bruno, the title has been fixed. Since there don't seem to be any concerns I'll proceed with kicking off the vote. Thanks all! On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 12:01 AM Bruno Cadonna <cado...@apache.org> wrote: > Thanks for the KIP, Sophie! > > I am also in favor of this KIP! > > I have one minor question: > > Why does the title of the KIP talk about task-level metrics, but the > specified metrics are on processor-level? > > For the rest, I am +1. > > Best, > Bruno > > On 29.05.22 00:20, John Roesler wrote: > > Thanks for the well motivated and documented KIP, Sophie! I’m in favor > of this change. > > > > -John > > > > On Sat, May 28, 2022, at 06:42, Sophie Blee-Goldman wrote: > >> Hey all, > >> > >> I'd like to propose a very small KIP to add two metrics that will help > fill > >> a gap in the derivable produced and consumed metrics. Please take a look > >> and reply here with any questions or concerns. > >> > >> KIP-846: Task-level Streams metrics for bytes/records Produced > >> < > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=211886093 > > > >> > >> Given the small nature of this I'm going to call for a vote soon, but > >> please don't hesitate to raise anything you feel should be discussed in > >> more detail first. > >> > >> Thanks! > >> Sophie >
