+1 (non-binding). I used the Scala 2.13 binaries and staged Maven artifacts and ran various tests with them. Thanks for doing the release.
Jakub On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 8:16 PM Mickael Maison <mimai...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Tom, > > Thanks for running this release! > > I've done the following: > - Checked signatures and checksums > - Checked javadocs/maven artifacts > - Built from source and run all tests with Java 11 > - Ran quickstart on Scala 2.13 artifact with Java 11 > > It looks like the website has not been updated yet, I still only see > 3.1.0. When you'll add 3.1.1, let's make sure we mention reload4j in > the notable changes section. > > +1 (binding) > > Thanks, > Mickael > > > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 11:12 AM Tom Bentley <tbent...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > Hello Kafka users, developers and client-developers, > > > > This is the first candidate for release of Apache Kafka 3.1.1. > > > > Apache Kafka 3.1.1 is a bugfix release and 30 issues have been fixed > > since 3.1.0. > > > > Release notes for the 3.1.1 release: > > https://home.apache.org/~tombentley/kafka-3.1.1-rc1/RELEASE_NOTES.html > > > > *** Please download, test and vote by 09:00 UTC, Friday 6th May > > > > Kafka's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release: > > https://kafka.apache.org/KEYS > > > > * Release artifacts to be voted upon (source and binary): > > https://home.apache.org/~tombentley/kafka-3.1.1-rc1/ > > > > * Maven artifacts to be voted upon: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/kafka/ > > > > * Javadoc: > > https://home.apache.org/~tombentley/kafka-3.1.1-rc1/javadoc/ > > > > * Tag to be voted upon (off 3.1 branch) is the 3.1.1 tag: > > https://github.com/apache/kafka/releases/tag/3.1.1-rc1 > > > > * Documentation: > > https://kafka.apache.org/31/documentation.html > > > > * Protocol: > > https://kafka.apache.org/31/protocol.html > > > > * Successful Jenkins builds for the 3.1 branch: > > I will share a link one the build is complete. > > > > /************************************** > > > > Thanks, > > Tom >
