Hi David, I agree with it! This is also a good way to let both parties (code author and reviewers) know there's a PR is not active anymore. Should we continue it or close it directly?
In my opinion, 1 year is too long, half a year should be long enough. Thank you. Luke On Sat, Feb 5, 2022 at 8:17 PM Sagar <sagarmeansoc...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hey David, > > That's a great idea.. Just to stress your point, this keeps both parties > informed if a PR has become stale. So, the reviewer would know that there > was some PR which was being reviewed but due to inactivity it got closed so > maybe time to relook and similarly the submitter. > > And yeah, any stale/unused PRs can be closed straight away thereby reducing > the load on reviewers. I have done some work on kubernetes open source and > they follow a similar paradigm which is useful. > > Thanks! > Sagar. >
