+1 I think this KIP solves a problem that has been around for some time with Kafka deployments, which is the ability to assess the current state of a Kafka architecture but looking at the whole picture. I also share other folks' concerns regarding adding runtime dependencies to the clients; this may be problematic for large deployments. Still, I think it is worth refactoring.
IMHO, it is a fair trade-off. — Ricardo > On Jan 26, 2022, at 9:34 AM, Magnus Edenhill <mag...@edenhill.se> wrote: > > Hi all, > > it's been a while and there's been some more discussions of the KIP which > have been > addressed on the KIP page. > > I think it's a good time to revive this vote thread and get things moving. > > We're currently at +3 (non-binding) and -1 (non-binding) votes. > > Regards, > Magnus > > > Den mån 1 nov. 2021 kl 21:19 skrev J Rivers <jrivers...@gmail.com>: > >> +1 >> >> Thank you for the KIP! >> >> Our organization runs kafka at large scale in a multi-tenant configuration. >> We actually have many other enterprises connecting up to our system to >> retrieve stream data. These feeds vary greatly in volume and velocity. The >> peak rates are a multiplicative factor of the nominal. There is extreme >> skew in our datasets in a number of ways. >> >> We don't have time to work with every new internal/external client to tune >> their feeds. They need to be able to take one of the many kafka clients and >> go off to the races. >> >> Being able to retrieve client metrics would be invaluable here as it's hard >> and time consuming to communicate out of the enterprise walls. >> >> This KIP is important to us to expand the use of our datasets internally >> and outside the borders of the enterprise. Our clients like the performance >> and data safeties related to the kafka connection. The observability has >> been a problem... >> >> Jonathan Rivers >> jrivers...@gmail.com >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 11:56 PM Ryanne Dolan <ryannedo...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> -1 >>> >>> Ryanne >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 18, 2021, 4:30 AM Magnus Edenhill <mag...@edenhill.se> >> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> I'd like to start a vote on KIP-714. >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/2xRRCg >>>> >>>> Discussion thread: >>>> https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@kafka.apache.org/msg119000.html >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Magnus >>>> >>> >>
