Thanks for voting and for the discussion, all! The vote on KIP-796 passes with: 3 binding +1 (Bruno, Bill, and myself) 2 non-binding +1 (Patrick and Vasiliki) no vetoes
The vote is now closed. If anyone has objections later on, please raise them, though! We will proceed with a series of pull requests to implement the framework, and we will also propose one or more small KIPs to propose specific queries. Thanks again, -John On Mon, 2021-11-22 at 12:11 -0500, Bill Bejeck wrote: > Thanks for the well-detailed KIP, John. > > It's a +1 (binding) from me. > > I want to point out one thing which I think is an oversight. The "Example > Raw Query" scan includes a line using the `kafkaStreams.serdesForStore` > method, but it's listed in the "Rejected Alternatives" section. > > Thanks, > Bill > > On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 9:22 AM Bruno Cadonna <cado...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Thanks for the KIP, John! > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Best, > > Bruno > > > > On 19.11.21 18:04, Vasiliki Papavasileiou wrote: > > > I think this KIP will greatly improve how we handle IQ in streams so +1 > > > (non-binding) from me. > > > > > > Thank you John! > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 9:45 PM Patrick Stuedi > > <pstu...@confluent.io.invalid> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding), thanks John! > > > > -Patrick > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 12:27 AM John Roesler <vvcep...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hello all, > > > > > > > > > > I'd like to open the vote for KIP-796, which proposes > > > > > a revamp of the Interactive Query APIs in Kafka Streams. > > > > > > > > > > The proposal is here: > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/34xnCw > > > > > > > > > > Thanks to all who reviewed the proposal, and thanks in > > > > > advance for taking the time to vote! > > > > > > > > > > Thank you, > > > > > -John > > > > > > > > > > > > > >