Thanks, everyone for the feedback and votes. I'm closing the vote with: - 3 +1 (binding) votes from Mickael, Gwen and David
- 4 +1 (non-binding) votes from Ryanne, Igor, Lopo and Josep On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 11:31 AM David Jacot <dja...@confluent.io.invalid> wrote: > +1 (binding). Thanks for the KIP, Omnia. > > On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 11:42 AM Omnia Ibrahim <o.g.h.ibra...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Can I get one last +1 binding for this KIP, please? > > > > On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 5:16 PM Omnia Ibrahim <o.g.h.ibra...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Thanks Gwen. > > > Can I get one more +1 binding for the KIP? > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 2:51 AM Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io.invalid > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> +1 (binding). Thank you for your patience and clear explanations, > Omnia. > > >> > > >> On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 3:39 PM Omnia Ibrahim < > o.g.h.ibra...@gmail.com> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> > Bumping up this voting thread. > > >> > > > >> > On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 1:57 PM Omnia Ibrahim < > > o.g.h.ibra...@gmail.com> > > >> > wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > Hi, > > >> > > Can I get 2 more +1 binding for this KIP? > > >> > > Thanks > > >> > > > > >> > > On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 5:14 PM Omnia Ibrahim < > > o.g.h.ibra...@gmail.com > > >> > > > >> > > wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > >> Hi All, > > >> > >> > > >> > >> Just thought of bumping this voting thread again to see if we can > > >> form a > > >> > >> consensus around this. > > >> > >> > > >> > >> Thanks > > >> > >> > > >> > >> On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 5:55 PM Mickael Maison < > > >> > mickael.mai...@gmail.com> > > >> > >> wrote: > > >> > >> > > >> > >>> +1 (binding) > > >> > >>> Thanks for the KIP! > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 3:23 PM Igor Soarez > > <soa...@apple.com.invalid > > >> > > > >> > >>> wrote: > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > Another +1 here, also non-binding. > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > Thank you Omnia! > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > -- > > >> > >>> > Igor > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > On Fri, Apr 30, 2021, at 3:15 PM, Ryanne Dolan wrote: > > >> > >>> > > +1 (non-binding), thanks! > > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021, 4:31 AM Omnia Ibrahim < > > >> > o.g.h.ibra...@gmail.com> > > >> > >>> wrote: > > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >>> > >> Hi > > >> > >>> > >> Can I get a vote on this, please? > > >> > >>> > >> > > >> > >>> > >> Best > > >> > >>> > >> Omnia > > >> > >>> > >> > > >> > >>> > >> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 12:16 PM Omnia Ibrahim < > > >> > >>> o.g.h.ibra...@gmail.com> > > >> > >>> > >> wrote: > > >> > >>> > >> > > >> > >>> > >>> If anyone interested in reading the discussions you can > find > > >> it > > >> > >>> here > > >> > >>> > >>> > > >> https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@kafka.apache.org/msg113373.html > > >> > >>> > >>> > > >> > >>> > >>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 4:01 PM Omnia Ibrahim < > > >> > >>> o.g.h.ibra...@gmail.com> > > >> > >>> > >>> wrote: > > >> > >>> > >>> > > >> > >>> > >>>> Hi everyone, > > >> > >>> > >>>> I’m proposing a new KIP for MirrorMaker 2 to add the > > ability > > >> to > > >> > >>> control > > >> > >>> > >>>> internal topics naming convention. The proposal details > are > > >> here > > >> > >>> > >>>> > > >> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-690%3A+Add+additional+configuration+to+control+MirrorMaker+2+internal+topics+naming+convention > > >> > >>> > >>>> > > >> > >>> > >>>> Please vote in this thread. > > >> > >>> > >>>> Thanks > > >> > >>> > >>>> Omnia > > >> > >>> > >>>> > > >> > >>> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > >> > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Gwen Shapira > > >> Engineering Manager | Confluent > > >> 650.450.2760 | @gwenshap > > >> Follow us: Twitter | blog > > >> > > > > > >
