Thanks Rajini! Yes it would be good to get it into 3.0. I've got some of it implemented already, I'll try to get a PR out in the next couple of weeks.
I'm closing this vote. This KIP has been accepted with 3 +1 binding votes from David, Tom and Rajini. On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 1:49 PM Rajini Sivaram <rajinisiva...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Mickael, > > +1 (binding) > > Thanks for the KIP!. Looks like this KIP has sufficient votes. It will be > good to get this into 3.0 along with KIP-709. Will you have time to work on > this? Please let us know if we can help with the implementation or reviews. > > Thank you, > > Rajini > > > On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 4:00 PM Tom Bentley <tbent...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > Hi Mickael, > > > > I'd like to re-cast my vote as +1 (binding) now I'm a committer. > > > > Thanks again, > > > > Tom > > > > On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 9:46 AM David Jacot <dja...@confluent.io> wrote: > > > > > Thanks for the KIP, Mickael. +1 (binding) > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 11:53 AM Tom Bentley <tbent...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding), thanks Mickael. > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 6:32 PM Mickael Maison <mimai...@apache.org> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > I'd like to start a vote on KIP-699 to support resolving multiple > > > > > coordinators at a time: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-699%3A+Update+FindCoordinator+to+resolve+multiple+Coordinators+at+a+time > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
