Hello everyone,
this is to warn that actual implementation of KIP-418 differs with the
approved specification in two points:
1. Instead of multiple overloaded variants of Branched.with we now have
Branched.withFunction (for functions) and Branched.withConsumer (for
consumers). This is because of compiler warnings about overloading:
Function and Consumer are indistinguishable for Java compiler when
supplied as lambdas, and thus we need to name methods differently.
2. 'Fully covariant' signatures like Consumer<? super KStream<? super K,
? super V>> don't work as expected. Using Consumer<? super KStream<K,
V>> etc. instead
I have updated the KIP.
Does anyone want to object these changes?
Regards,
Ivan
06.07.2020 21:43, Matthias J. Sax пишет:
I am late, but I am also +1 (binding).
-Matthias
On 7/6/20 2:16 AM, Ivan Ponomarev wrote:
Wow!
So excited to hear that!
Thanks for your collaboration, now it's my turn to write a PR.
Regards,
Ivan
04.07.2020 20:16, John Roesler пишет:
Hi Ivan,
Congratulations! It looks like you have 3 binding and 2 non-binding
votes, so you can announce this KIP as accepted and follow up with a PR.
Thanks,
John
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020, at 20:46, Bill Bejeck wrote:
Thanks for the KIP Ivan, +1 (binding).
-Bill
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 7:22 PM Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com>
wrote:
+1 (binding). Thanks Ivan!
Guozhang
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 3:55 AM Jorge Esteban Quilcate Otoya <
quilcate.jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
This will be a great addition. Thanks Ivan!
+1 (non-binding)
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 7:07 PM John Roesler <vvcep...@apache.org>
wrote:
Thanks, Ivan!
I’m +1 (binding)
-John
On Thu, May 28, 2020, at 17:24, Ivan Ponomarev wrote:
Hello all!
I'd like to start the vote for KIP-418 which proposes deprecation of
current `branch` method and provides a method-chaining based API for
branching.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-418%3A+A+method-chaining+way+to+branch+KStream
Regards,
Ivan
--
-- Guozhang
